English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

39 answers

Come on people, LET'S Be REALISTIC, and REASONABLE. . .

No, because that wouldn't be a great idea for the US to do, and it would only cause chaos.


And no, because it's not practical, it's not going to happen, it won't happen, it's a fact, is that clear?

People can complain and cry about it but it won't or ever happen, so don't worry, ok?

edit. . . .
You can give me and the others thumbs down but that only questions what kind of person you are. and we use common sense when we say "No."

2007-08-10 15:58:02 · answer #1 · answered by rmon 6 · 1 4

WE have to send a strong message that this is not acceptable. Part of the problem is the corrupt Mexican government. It is impractical to deport millions ot illegals but there should be some penalty for breaking the law.

2007-08-16 10:33:48 · answer #2 · answered by Jane T 3 · 0 0

If there are 22 million of them and one investigator and three removal officers arrest one each day and an attorney prosecutes 4 a day, that means it will take about 75 years to find them all and issue removal orders if we double the Office of Detention and Removals.

That might actually help alot of them. Currently, there is no method of legalizing EWIs and overstays unless they are brought before a judge and given the opportunity to apply for a stay of removal.

Since there is no way we can build enough detention centers for any but the worst criminals, the rest will get social security cards and EADs and can get green cards if they can show that it would be a hardship for them to leave, or at least they can stay for a couple of years while their appeals are heard and then a few more while they are caught again and subject to expedited removal.

So if we double the agents and quadruple the attorneys, we can get to them all within 150 years assuming no more get in,

2007-08-10 15:26:31 · answer #3 · answered by BruceN 7 · 2 1

sure. unlawful immigrants improve crime, taxes bypass up and that they injury our financial gadget. at some point in the process the week, bypass and bypass on your interior reach well being sanatorium and notice what share honestly everyone seems to be getting scientific interest on the taxpayers price. If we bypass to Mexico or the different u . s . we'd ought to get papers and we would desire to be deported. Why shouldn't illegals residing interior the united statesbe deported?

2016-10-14 22:11:00 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I believe they should. I really wish they would quit coming here. If your legal great but if not go back to your own country and work on improving it there. Your all like little locusts and sucking up our resources, jobs, and such that WE CITIZENS have earned a right to and have made available on our own. It is frustrating that we are becoming the minority. I can be a blunt **** and I will tell them exactly how i feel. yes the statue of liberty said "give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free"....but there has to be order to that too. if we take them then what makes america so much better than where they came from

2007-08-17 20:30:02 · answer #5 · answered by gothicragdolly 2 · 0 0

Yes. Actually, they should be forced out for their own good. If we deport them, 90% will make it back before the buses that took them over will. If a law is passed that will make it impossible for illegals to find work, they'll leave on their own accord. It costs less and the effect is the same minus the sneaking back in part.

2007-08-10 18:06:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This not only applies to the USA, the UK has an equally large problem. Does not the word illegal say it all?? If I do something illegal (like the hideous crime of parking my car one inch over a double yellow line) I would be made to pay for the "crime". They know that they are committing an offence when they come here. "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime". Send them back!

2007-08-16 23:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it should be looked at on a case by case basis. It just wouldn't be practical and rational to round up people and deport them all at once. They should take into consideration how long they have been here, are they married, do they have US citizen children, have they committed any crimes other than crossing illegally, etc? I think we should be more compassionate and give good people a chance. Just deport the dangerous felons not the good and hard working people who love the USA!

2007-08-10 14:34:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Phew this is a tough one... Not! Let's me real, there illegal of course they should be deported. There should be no second guessing. Look at the results of the illegals not being deported after committing a crime, they commit more serious crimes. They are also stealing peoples social security numbers. They need to be kicked out and prevented from coming in.

2007-08-10 13:52:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Yes, simple as that.

They got here one at a time illegally, the same way they will be deported.

If we remove the reasons they come, they WILL stop coming...and most will return on their own.

Deport the rest. That simple.

2007-08-11 14:51:02 · answer #10 · answered by ProUSA2 6 · 0 0

They are CRIMIALS... they committed a crime against the the people of the United States when they crossed the border improperly. It's called ILLEGAL because it's breaking our laws. Should we allow a criminal to continue to commit that crime. I DON'T think so. YES !!! THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED! If we could devise a way to prevent them from ever coming back, we should use it.If it were possible to put them under house arrest... (the house being Mexico),that might keep them on their side of the border. If Only!!
But our only recourse is to deport.... SO DEPORT!

2007-08-10 14:13:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers