Are neo-cons for hand-outs when banks are on the receiving end versus hungry people?

Answer 1

I haven't investigated the bank issues, but as far as the hungry people,
I am in favor of there being a safety net, but the liberals have made the safety net too comfy. People no longer mind the fall so much & aren't in a hurry to get back on their feet anymore.

And in America we have very few hungry people - really hungry people! The few hungry are usually the addict who sells their food stamps for drugs.

The impoverished family next door is a family of five and each one is overweight. And the father is scared that if he goes back to work he will lose all his benifits.

They are a classic example of how helping too much does more harm than good.

Answer 2

Wow, human beings somewhat do rearrange background to examine their agendas. Communism fell in the Soviet Union with the aid of fact it ought to no longer sustain its monetary device. that's the comparable reason communism will finally fall in China, purely China is somewhat smarter approximately it and permitting the variations to happen on their very own words. Reagan compelled the soviets to spend way much extra then they'd by using in actuality forcing an hands race that the Soviets purely couldnt save up with. Reagan knew the monetary device became into sketchy and that the Soviets have been pouring in too lots funds into an hands application they would not in any respect ever use with the aid of fact it would propose their very own annihalation. the internal conflict in the Soviet Union for the duration of the chilly warfare became into under no circumstances somewhat seen a civil warfare and inner conflicts nonetheless exist. Russia remains coping with fairly some communities interior itself that needs to declare its independence. It had to enable a number of states circulate while the Soviet Union fell and its coping with different communities that desire independence besides. Say what you desire to approximately Reagan yet once you dont supply Reagan a minimum of a few, if no longer a considerable element, of the credit for the autumn of the Soviet Union then you definately are purely ignoring the info.

Answer 3

No, but they are often seduced into aiding (most often 'bailing out' as in the 80's S&L fiasco) financial institutions by the desire for a 'strong economy.' They forget that, as much as a bank failure, recession, or other economic shock might be at the time, it does set the stage for stronger institutions, an economic recovery, or other postives down the line.

Answer 4

I think you bring up a good point, apparently Hillary agrees:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070807/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_mortgage_lenders;_ylt=At6afrGBDZoagTw_3oLH.YmyFz4D

Notice that she is proposing bailouts, but does not specify any FCC regulations to curb unethical lending and collection practices practices. Did I miss the part where she condemned "vulture" practices of collection agencies that buy $2,000 debts for $100 and sue low-income consumers for $3,500?

It does confirm my suspicion that she's actually a neo-con at heart, merely using Democrat talking points. Go ahead, call me crazy but it's still a free country and the thought police haven't knocked down my door... yet. :-)

Answer 5

Last time I looked the checks that the poor people get from the government are cashed or deposited at a bank.

I don't understand why so many liberals think Republicans are rich. Most are middle class Americans working hard to make a living who understand that each man needs to make his own way in this world and not rely on the government.

Answer 6

Let the market crash for all I care bro. Make it hard for people to get loans will help to deflate the value of homes thus allow the rich Repubs to make mo money. I may be in the market to buy a house. A lower price for the house is better, no?
As far as the hungry, they are being fed from donations and help mostly from the right wing Republicans.
You've been listening to Hillary too long. She is full of schit.

Answer 7

i don't have a problem with the government supporting the economy and keeping disaster at bay, but it bugs me that its all about big money...big money controls our lives, we should extract a bit of decency from them and allow the economy a chance to benefit, but not at the expense of the working class...the stock market does not need to break records in order for America to thrive

Answer 8

I just heard that on NPR, 24 billion, and there is more money coming from the federal government.

Answer 9

Of course they are... those CEO's and Board of Directors can not be denied their 4th and 5th homes

Corporate Welfare
* The Shame Page *
http://www.progress.org/banneker/cw.html

Answer 10

Air travel right after 9/11

Don't forget that handout to the airline industry.