I have several questions:
1. Do you favor a requirement that recipients of welfare, unemployment insurance, student loans and other similar types of aid work if they are able to?
2. Do you favor legalized prostitution?
3. If you favor 1 and 2, would you favor any program making the receipt of benefits conditioned on work that could include prostitution? Why or why not, if it's legal? And what other exceptions would you create, if any? (How about a fire fighter? Legal, but dangerous!) Or is it not fair to have ANY exceptions if someone is taking taxpayer money?
I did know people working their way through college as strippers. It was legal, but there was some stigma. Maybe the stigma, and not the illegality, is the problem.
I obviously would not like to see people coerced into prostitution - women or men.
But I'm chiefly interested in your views!
Thanks.
2007-07-26
05:39:42
·
5 answers
·
asked by
American citizen and taxpayer
7
in
Other - Politics & Government