Politics & Government - 24 July 2007

Earlier I asked the Real Estate community if they felt it necessary for me when selling, to disclose the fact that I had plumbing problems in my condo since it was built (2003) even though the builder had repaired them last July (2006) and I have not had a problem since. I was overwhelmingly encouraged to disclose with information regarding the corrections. I agree after reading the responses that I should disclose. However, the builder contracted the repairs at their expense as it was considered a warranty and they never gave me any paperwork detailing the nature of the repairs. Is there a law that says they must provide this info or some way that I can insist on getting documented evidence of the repairs? I want to have something in writing that outlines the corrections to present to a potential buyer otherwise I fear I will never be able to sell. If anyone has any suggestions for how I might go about getting such info from the builder without hassle, please advise. Thanks!

2007-07-24 12:42:38 · 4 answers · asked by Miss T 3 in Law & Ethics

So I guess the tide is turning eh? Only 16% of brainwashed Americans believe the ridiculous fairy tale of Osama Bin Forgotten and his band of crazy suicide terrorists (some of which are still alive by the way even though they died in the plane crash).

Based on polling, about 84% believe the government is hiding something or covering something up. About 40% of Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job engineered by the BushFraud regime.

That doesn't even take into account all the people around the world that are laughing at those 16% that cannot see through the fraud.

2007-07-24 12:41:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2007-07-24 12:39:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Please anser the following numbered questions.
1. SHould president Bush be impeached? Yes or No
2. If yes, for what?
3. If yes, what will YOU do to be proactive in YOUR government?
4. Do you think Bush has ties to the Ladin family? Like Oil?
5. Did you know the Ladin family was flown out of the country along with other Saudis 2 days after 9/11?
6. Did you know that 14 of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi's?
7. Do you know how much of our country they own? (pssst it's billions)
8. Is it a coincidence that Bushkin has lengthy oil industry ties to the Saudi's, and they go unpunished for 9/11 involvement?
9. Does ANYONE in our government have the guts to do ANYHTHING?
10. Are we so overworked and scared that we have ceased being proactive?
11. Does our government fear us? Or are we, Americans, the ones living in fear?
Yeah....I'm dang mad....can't wait till November 08...bye Bush. And ...need to go change my party affiliation to Dem!

2007-07-24 12:39:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

What lies ahead after 2007?

2007-07-24 12:39:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

i know it has to do something with lawsuits

2007-07-24 12:37:22 · 7 answers · asked by arigont 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-07-24 12:34:48 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

as a consular? Thanks :)

2007-07-24 12:34:42 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Embassies & Consulates

2007-07-24 12:33:48 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

all use Y/a. Isn't that a record of note?

2007-07-24 12:33:32 · 17 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 in Politics

2007-07-24 12:31:35 · 2 answers · asked by ****Sparkles*** 3 in Law & Ethics

It reaches the wrongdoer, not the business entity.Please explain???

2007-07-24 12:30:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-07-24 12:28:27 · 10 answers · asked by philrobeson 4 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-07-24 12:27:06 · 13 answers · asked by oli 2 in Law & Ethics

Hi
Do you think that corruption exists in British politics?
Ray. West York's. U.K.

2007-07-24 12:25:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

come up during the republican debate to make up for the lack of the democrats discussing terrorism? What is wrong with the democrats? Don't they realize the sky is falling, or do they realize we have major problems at home that are even more important than living their lives in fear of terrorists? Seriously, is our children learning?

2007-07-24 12:25:19 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Is there a way to measure if one act of terrorism is more extreme than the other or is terrorism the same on all levels regardless of severity???? For example is there a such thing as Minor terrorism (taking hostages) and Large scale terrorism (bombing the world trade center)??

2007-07-24 12:17:28 · 2 answers · asked by college girl 1 in Military

The part of the First Amendment that says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” is called the Establishment Clause. It is the Establishment Clause that causes most of the arguments. Why do you think most Supreme Court justices, along with many political and religious leaders, believe that government should not help religion in any way? What could happen if the the Establishment Clause did not exist?

2007-07-24 12:16:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

I am a Texas resident myself, I love it here, probably wouldn't live anywhere else in this country, but I'm getting pretty sick of the religious right. Do you think that Texas will ever join the modern school of thought, or always be about the moral majority? Serious answers, please.

2007-07-24 12:16:19 · 10 answers · asked by ? 4 in Law & Ethics

Reasons:
1. Illegal wire taping
2. illegal detainment of US citizens without proper and timely due process.
3. lying for the lead up to the war.

I am sure that we can think of many other things, but the reasons listed are my concerns.

The MOVEMENTS TO IMPEACH SEEM TO FALL SHORT OF GOALS:
1. Dennis Kucinnich introduced articles and it was ignored.
2. John Conyors, Barbara Boxer, Republican Chuck Hagel explored these issues publically.
3. Seven states considered resolutions and Vermont passed a resolution but all have fallen short of gaining serious national attention.

Zogby poll says that 53% of Americans will support impeachment. (This includes dems and conservs).

Now that it is election time Bush's own party has parted ways with him b/c he hasn't given them a good record to run on!

(( This president seems to be above the law and above criticism!))

QUESTION TO YOU??
When are we going to be about the business of doing this and stop giving this lip service???

2007-07-24 12:14:51 · 5 answers · asked by Andre L 1 in Law & Ethics

Our chain-smoking naive lil' friend definitely turned off most Americans with that idiotic comment.

2007-07-24 12:13:08 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-07-24 12:12:21 · 7 answers · asked by wallyshields 2 in Politics

Reasons:
1. Illegal wire taping
2. illegal detainment of US citizens without proper and timely due process.
3. lying for the lead up to the war.

I am sure that we can think of many other things, but the reasons listed are my concerns.

The MOVEMENTS TO IMPEACH SEEM TO FALL SHORT OF GOALS:
1. Dennis Kucinnich introduced articles and it was ignored.
2. John Conyors, Barbara Boxer, Republican Chuck Hagel explored these issues publically.
3. Seven states considered resolutions and Vermont passed a resolution but all have fallen short of gaining serious national attention.

Zogby poll says that 53% of Americans will support impeachment. (This includes dems and conservs).

Now that it is election time Bush's own party has parted ways with him b/c he hasn't given them a good record to run on!

(( This president seems to be above the law and above criticism!))

QUESTION TO YOU??
When are we going to be about the business of doing this and stop giving this lip service???

2007-07-24 12:11:55 · 22 answers · asked by Andre L 1 in Politics

Do they give you another date or go on with the proceedings anyway?

2007-07-24 12:11:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

2007-07-24 12:10:34 · 17 answers · asked by The real Ed-Mike 3 in Politics

I know that part of the process of applying for just visitation to canada is some sort of background check reguarding your family as well. my dad has over 6 ouis and i got mine a couple of years ago.

2007-07-24 12:07:59 · 4 answers · asked by aammyy 1 in Immigration

2007-07-24 12:07:30 · 1 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 in Politics

Can someone tell me what this actually means: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

That's from the White House's website and other websites/blogs are reading it to mean that it's in a sense 'illegal to protest the war'.

Can someone read through that legalese and tell me exactly or at least what they think it means? Because I read it and still have no idea what it's actually saying.

Thanks in advance.

2007-07-24 12:07:00 · 6 answers · asked by Peace 4 in Law & Ethics

2007-07-24 12:05:42 · 10 answers · asked by ♥ Mel 7 in Politics

We can eat burritos and every thing. What do you say?

2007-07-24 12:04:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration