This is a serious question, so please don’t start being abusive. I’m British & really want to understand this.
I see a lot of comments like “Lucky Clinton wasn’t in-charge on 9/11” or “Clinton ignored Bin Laden & didn’t prevent 9/11” etc.
Outside America, Clinton was popular & gave the US a great image. He helped Britain find peace with the IRA and supported the Kosovo conflict.
Didn't he also stabilise the US deficit & put the economy in the black (currently in the red)
I read he was attacked by the right wing Neocon’s because he didn’t sponsor their aggressive, conflict driven foreign policy. It was smear?
Didn’t Clinton have "A Comprehensive Strategy to Fight Al-Qaeda" that was handed to Bush & then ignored?
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/index.htm
http://www.mikehersh.com/Republicans_sabotaged_Clintons_Anti-Terror_Efforts.shtml
The first WTC attack was in Clinton’s first month as President. But he didn’t blame Bush Snr. Why is Clinton blamed for G.W. Bush?
2006-12-24
06:30:45
·
33 answers
·
asked by
Cracker
4
in
Other - Politics & Government