Politics & Government - 2 November 2006

I should know, I am a war veteran from the French Royal forces

2006-11-02 07:38:52 · 8 answers · asked by french_war_veteran 1 in Politics

u know that these days middle east is so importann for tthe politic powers in the world. i want to know the major importace of this part of the world.

2006-11-02 07:37:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Lots of members of the media like to say that too many people think that Iraq's Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. The funny thing is not that many people think Iraq did 9/11 and the Bush administration has explicitly said so on many occasions.

However, if you read the internal numbers for the polls an intriguing number jumps out...

More liberal Democrats believe their own government, the United States, is responsble for 9/11 than any other dubious conspiracy theory.

Why are there more dumb liberal Democrats than any other group? Are they paranoid? Gullible? Uneducated?

2006-11-02 07:36:05 · 19 answers · asked by ABC 3 in Government

I received counterfeit postal money orders and cashed them at my bank. 2 weeks later they tell me they are counterfeit and now I am $2800 in the hole. Can I tell them that I wont pay them back?

2006-11-02 07:35:29 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

We are led to believe by the police "Experts" that no two people can have the same dna profile; as "experts" are currently under fire for influencing court decisions by making ludicrous statements,which are seldom if ever questioned, due to their status in society, and which have resulted in people being wrongly imprisoned.could the law be wrong?
My question is: Who,of any standing, other than the law! and of course the inventor, has ever put put the whole dna theory to the test?
I watched a tv programe some time back, and if memory serves me correctly, The inventor of the whole dna theory, stated that we are all related and that the difference in peoples dna was so infinitesimal, as to be almost undetectable, can anyone recall anyone,other than the law, ever doing any investigation into the subject, We all blindly believe in what in effect is a very complex matter, and what we are told on the subject, But are we going to be finding mistakes were made yet again in future years

2006-11-02 07:35:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 07:32:07 · 6 answers · asked by Tina c 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Are U against America changing, or in favor, and why?

2006-11-02 07:31:17 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

shall i kick her out too??

2006-11-02 07:31:00 · 28 answers · asked by benneth 1 in Law & Ethics

I know they are out there in bunches as I have talked to them and read their postings here on Yahoo.

2006-11-02 07:30:33 · 15 answers · asked by Gone Rogue 7 in Politics

could you name the worst politician in india? CHOOSE FIRST in 10 .

2006-11-02 07:30:29 · 17 answers · asked by Sekar 4 in Government

The dictionary (American Heritage) states that it is, "A war between factions or regions of the same country."

(Please don't copy/paste dictionary definitions)

2006-11-02 07:30:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

... but ended up making a horse-faced a s s out of himself? Assuming, just for the sake of argument, that he really didn't mean to insult our troops, his supposed decision to insult Bush was a really bad one. An analysis by ABCNews said it best: Kerry's problem is that he is thoroughly convinced that he is smarter than George W. Bush, even though his academic performance at Yale was worse than Bush's. In other words, he was outsmarted by Bush "the idiot" in 2004, and it's still eating him up inside. He doesn't understand how this "idiot" from Texas beat him.

Perhaps it would benefit Kerry to finally admit to himself that he is not nearly as bright as he believes, and may in fact be dimmer than GW Bush.

2006-11-02 07:30:05 · 7 answers · asked by The Truth Hurts! Ouch! 5 in Politics

Is it legal or ok to wear a balaklava in the street? As i own one which i bought for a camping trip. It is getting rather cold in the mornings going to work, i was wondering if it was legal to wear one. Or would the police be hassling me every ten minutes. anyone know

2006-11-02 07:28:31 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 07:27:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Just curious.

2006-11-02 07:26:31 · 19 answers · asked by Tiny 2 in Politics

2006-11-02 07:26:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them --
although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals.
The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer
to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes,
raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding
was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour,
bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea --
keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter -- probably collect --
who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud,
and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to
cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes --
more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return,
they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted
the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much
we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea.
Japan and South Korea -- actual allies, unlike France and Germany -- were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape
weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next
U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 -- under a new administration, you'll note -- The New York Times reported on the front page,
so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence,
North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence,
lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil.
He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy."
This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann,
not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel
"that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention."
If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan.
But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers
(and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes
like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea
cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in
1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented
the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" -- i.e., right up until the day
The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce.
In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action.
Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.
THIS ARTICLE BY ANN COULTER::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

2006-11-02 07:25:18 · 11 answers · asked by just the facts 5 in Politics

2006-11-02 07:25:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

can "Free Speech" be defined, or can we only list the things that isnt free speech?

2006-11-02 07:24:44 · 14 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2 in Other - Politics & Government

The election is not about Kerry, if anyone is holding Kerry's dumb goof, I am sure that there are quiet a bit more goofs Bush has uttered only since having the bought the office.

2006-11-02 07:23:29 · 11 answers · asked by me_worry? 4 in Politics

Dono if i spelled that right, Anyways, I am Thinking of making this Game called Third Life, Very Simmilar to Linden Labs Second Life. People are saying i will get sued for Copyright, In Second Life there money and employees are referd to as Lindens. Mine would be refered to as Linnens, A complete diffrent Spelling, Diffrent Pronounciation, I must know now, Will i get sued for making this game, Or had i just better not make it?

2006-11-02 07:22:08 · 8 answers · asked by Matthew 5 in Law & Ethics

About 3 years ago Jesse Jackson was on TV here in chicago (fox 32), He and the rainbow push coalition were pouring cans and 40s of bud on the street while declaring that Bud is a racist beer company and blah blah blah. Well a few months later his son Jesse Jackson Jr. purchased the distribution rights for Bud on the North Side of Chicago, might I add at a discounted rate.. Is this not illegal? Does selling the distribution rights for a mostly white rich area to Jackson Jr. make it ok for them to be racist? Since this is bound to cause some anger I must please ask you to look into this yourself, i saw this all on Tv the 9 o'clock news on FOX 32 about 2-3 years ago and I cant find anything about it now.

2006-11-02 07:21:47 · 4 answers · asked by feargov 2 in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 07:21:09 · 6 answers · asked by Sunnie 5 in Politics

All sects about all nationalities and ethnic groups and religions of the Undocumented Immigrants

2006-11-02 07:19:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-11-02 07:18:30 · 4 answers · asked by daddy2b0423 1 in Law & Ethics

Which is it? Elite or welfare? Both?

2006-11-02 07:16:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-11-02 07:16:36 · 2 answers · asked by brandys_peep 2 in Elections

I ask a question. "How do you really know the person you vote for when it comes to politics, after all we are fooled by family and friends we think we know." One answer was "thats why I vote the issue". How do you vote issues when it isn't an amendent or law and know that person you chose will not change there stand? Concerns?

2006-11-02 07:16:23 · 4 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics

2006-11-02 07:15:53 · 8 answers · asked by Beaujock 1 in Military

2006-11-02 07:15:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics