United States Senator Robert Taft from Ohio states in (President) John Kennedy's, "Profiles in Courage"...Nurenberg was a farce because the accused could never have been found innocent, which eliminates any concept of a fair trial.
Niall Ferguson, Harvard Professor,, author of War of the World, stated...Nurenberg was a farce because the Allied powers put on trial Nazi Germany, when one of the members of the Allied powers was far more guilty of war crimes, crimes against the state and crimes against humanity than Nazi Germany. Ferguson was referring to the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin.
Stalin was far more brutal due to the greater amount of people effected by the murderous regime of the Communist Party in Russia under Stalin and for a longer period of time.
Is there any truth to either Senator Taft or Niall Ferguson?
And, what about the trial of Sadam Husain, Milosevic or if captured alive, ...Osama bin Laden.
Truth as we know a trial should be, theater or P.R.?
2006-10-10
18:43:59
·
1 answers
·
asked by
marnefirstinfantry
5
in
Law & Ethics