English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 7 October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2006-10-07 19:11:37 · 10 answers · asked by go UCLA bruins! 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

Or is all the money spent on White House court cost taking some of there azz out of office just a over sight?

2006-10-07 19:09:50 · 4 answers · asked by ? 3 in Government

2006-10-07 19:05:33 · 3 answers · asked by mistshevious 2 in Government

Show me how can I an Undocumented immigrant from Mexico, can find the path to Legallity, residence or Citizenship.


Tell me How can I stop being Undocumented immigrant and How can I become Documented immigrant.

Laws are being Reformed... so.... you people... stop bi't'ch'ing and start Communicating.


Ciao.

2006-10-07 19:04:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I have heard this Bug Stop here all my life and that was over 30 years ago, so when doe sit really STOP

2006-10-07 19:04:02 · 1 answers · asked by ? 3 in Government

I am in my second year of college. It is too late to join a NROTC, Marine option, program at a college? What are the requirements? What is a typical day like? Thank you all for your help!

2006-10-07 18:58:08 · 1 answers · asked by Katie 3 in Military

Over recent years it appears that carrying of firearms by police officers in the United Kingdom has become more common. One now sees armed police on every trip to the airport. Which police units now regularly carry guns? I have only ever seen armed police in London, but are they armed elsewhere too? SO19 are the Specialist Firearms Command and are obviously armed. So, is SO16 the only other armed group? Are SO14 not armed?

2006-10-07 18:54:47 · 5 answers · asked by l0st 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

QUOTE "The rumors about another top GOP member of the House being involved in sexual encounters with young "men for hire" are confirmed to WMR by well-placed sources in Washington's gay community. The member in question is House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whose "alternate" life style is the primary reason for him and his staff covering up the scandal involving ex-Florida GOP Rep. Mark Foley and his lewd messages sent to underage male congressional pages. Hastert's penchant to receive anal sex is well-known to our sources in DC's gay community.

"The GOP and neo-con spin machines are trying to tamp down the scandal for one major reason. If the scandal continues to grow, what has been described by Hill sources as a secretive GOP "homoerotic network" in Washington, DC will be exposed"

Click: http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

Will Apologists for the GOP keep up the self-righteous name-calling after this comes out and admit they've been fooled?

2006-10-07 18:53:31 · 8 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Elections

I THINK 100% HE WILL GET CHOSEN AND BE IN OFFICE FOR TWO TERMS JUST LIKE HIS BRO! Runs in the family!

2006-10-07 18:52:41 · 20 answers · asked by Mr. Yahoo 1 in Elections

We have thousands of Illegal working in the U.S. Question-The social security administration know that thier s.s.n. are not valid or someone else. And they tell the employer to verify there personel information. If it doesn't match dont worry about it, you can fire him because of this.And this is repeated every year. Why waste postage and stamps. For the same old meaning less ********.

2006-10-07 18:51:47 · 8 answers · asked by wondering 1 in Government

Name the things they might have in common

2006-10-07 18:51:19 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3 in Government

This man helped me with something for my job and he saw info that he shouldn't have seen. The info was very limited and no one was hurt by it. I made a bad choice, but I had no ill intent of any kind. Months after he helped me, he contacted my employer and told them. I have been fired from my job, denied unemployment, don't have insurance. This person took everything he could from me because he "loved' me and I didn't love him. We were friends; he wanted more; I didn't. I never treated him badly or anything. He harassed me to the point I got a restraining order. I filed a grievance trying to get my job back-doesn't look good. My employer seems to be trying to screw me. What he told them was true, but his reasoning behind it was malicious. Do I have any legal recourse against him? I want him to understand the impact of what he did. My job was my passion. He hurt me, but he also hurt my clients. What are my chances if I appeal unemployment? Any other suggestions (yes I'm looking for work

2006-10-07 18:46:32 · 6 answers · asked by What would you do? 1 in Law & Ethics

Will the USA go into North Korea even after we got our butts kicked back in 1953?

2006-10-07 18:43:10 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

He's not gay but we ( Family ) are thinking about telling the Marines he is gay in order to save his life. How fast will they kick him out of the Marines?

2006-10-07 18:39:19 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-10-07 18:37:57 · 25 answers · asked by Ned B 1 in Politics

don't be jealous folks!
Learn Spanish!
Learn history!
Learn Culturalism!


Learn Politics!


and

Practice Democracy!

2006-10-07 18:36:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2006 election.
Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.
Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.
Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.
Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is Communist.
Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.
Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?
A: Don't be a smart-***.
Q: I didn't think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate leader anyway.

2006-10-07 18:36:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

im sort of on the fence because i have many liberal and conservative family, friends, and teachers
why do you think he is good/bad

2006-10-07 18:33:54 · 31 answers · asked by Linda 3 in Government

2006-10-07 18:33:04 · 16 answers · asked by ? 3 in Government

Do you think there is more to the assassination of John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy than people know?

I believe John and Robert played some part in the death of Marilyn Monroe and she was married to Joe Dimaggio who said he still loved her after their divorce.

I've seen shows stating the John Kennedy was probably killed by the Italian mafia, Joe Dimaggio was Italian.

I'm sure he was heart broken by the death of Marilyn Monroe, is it possible both John and Robert were killed because of their possible involvement in Marilyn's death.

I'd think Joe Dimaggio would have the power to have this done or his friends would have done it for him, I'd also think if the goverment knew it they wouldn't have messed with him knowing they asked for it.

Do you think this is possible?

2006-10-07 18:32:23 · 9 answers · asked by Sean 7 in Politics

If they are so busy working and paying Taxes!! They don't have the time to learn English! So "We" have to learn Spanish, since "We" have a lot of free time to use Yaoo answers..
Tres tristes tigres tragaban trigo en un trigal, Erre con Erre Cigarro, Erre con erre barril, rapido corren los carros del ferrocarril.

2006-10-07 18:27:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Removal of the 2 term limit is now a proposal before congress! What are your thoughts?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52246

2006-10-07 18:22:31 · 20 answers · asked by speakeasy 6 in Elections

Bush's Iraq options limited
By Paul Reynolds BBC News website
A warning by a senior Republican senator that "bold decisions" will be required on Iraq if progress is not made soon has prompted talk that the White House might be forced into policy changes after the mid-term elections in November. The problem for President George W Bush was illustrated by an example only this last week. The hope that US troops would be "stood down" as Iraqi troops "stand up" was turned upside down. It was an Iraqi police unit in Baghdad that was stood down, because of suspicions that it was condoning militia murders. If the US cannot rely on the Iraqis, then the policy of transferring responsibility has no prospect of success. And if there is no political solution, then the violence will continue. There are at least four wars going on Iraq - the war by jihadists against US troops, the war by nationalists against US troops, the war by Sunni jihadists against Shias and the war by Shia militias against Sunnis. Any action he takes to alleviate one area could impact on another. He is hardly likely to announce a withdrawal. He himself has said that Iraq is the frontline in the war on terror he declared after 9/11. Withdrawal therefore would be an admission of defeat in that war and might hand the country over to the jihadists, his absolutely worst nightmare. Talks with insurgents? He could send more troops. The US public would be doubtful to say the least and Congress might not fund them. He could threaten to withdraw some troops in the hope of shocking the Iraqi government do more against the Shia militias. But that might simply not work. And it could encourage the insurgents.

2006-10-07 18:13:56 · 11 answers · asked by zeca do trombone 5 in Military

In the 60s Liberals talked of love,flowers ,and peace and then caused millions of Vietnamese to be murdered while fighting for freedom.---Then their "help" caused many people in the minority to become addicted to welfare.

2006-10-07 18:12:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

fedest.com, questions and answers