QUOTE "The rumors about another top GOP member of the House being involved in sexual encounters with young "men for hire" are confirmed to WMR by well-placed sources in Washington's gay community. The member in question is House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whose "alternate" life style is the primary reason for him and his staff covering up the scandal involving ex-Florida GOP Rep. Mark Foley and his lewd messages sent to underage male congressional pages. Hastert's penchant to receive anal sex is well-known to our sources in DC's gay community.
"The GOP and neo-con spin machines are trying to tamp down the scandal for one major reason. If the scandal continues to grow, what has been described by Hill sources as a secretive GOP "homoerotic network" in Washington, DC will be exposed"
Click: http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
Will Apologists for the GOP keep up the self-righteous name-calling after this comes out and admit they've been fooled?
2006-10-07 18:53:31 · 8 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
HAS ANYONE READ THE QUOTE FROM THE ARTICLE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A MASSIVE COVERUP BY HASTERT.
2006-10-07 19:22:50 · update #1
I am starting to see the coverup and the reasons for it...Hastert is gay too.he shares a D.C. townhome with his 55 year old unmarried, childless Chief of Staff Scott Palmer.....also in 1980 there were rumors that Hastert engaged in illegal behavior with male students while he was a High school wrestling coach in Yorkville IL..I would say that he is living on the "Down Low"..
Brokeback Congress????
2006-10-09 08:29:15 · answer #1 · answered by mayigniteunderpressure 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Currently the Republicans on the Hill are in what has been called "a circular firing squad", everybody covering themselves. Information that is being brought out by House Republicans and by Pages themselves shows that Foley was no secret. At least as long ago as four years he was doing things like trying to get into the pages sleeping accommodations at night.
Having refused so far to resign, the Squeaker of the House may yet find that he has to, as the situation continues to worsen and the election is less than a month away.
2006-10-08 11:16:46 · answer #2 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure Republicans will take the same amount of responsibility that democrankies did with Gerry Studds. You hypocrits didn't demand he resign, you idiots actually supported him. He wasn't sending e-mails to a 17 year old, he was actually porking a 16 year old and the Democrankie stance was that the kid was an adult and what goes on between adults is no one else's business. How come that drunken sot Tip O'Neill didn't resign when Studds was caught in a blatent act of pedophilia? It's because all Democrankies are sexual perverts.
2006-10-08 00:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
By not reporting the known activities of the Republican homosexual pedophile, Hastert was following the Bush policy of "staying the course".
By engaging male children in sexually-charged emails, Foley was following the Bush policy of "leave no child's behind".
2006-10-08 04:53:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did the Republicans encourage this man to have inappropriate conversations with the pages? There are all kinds of weirdos who run for public office and they are voted in by unobservant members of either party.
Do you remember when there were sex parties in the cloak room of Congress? Did anyone ask Tip O'Neil to step down?
2006-10-07 19:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by Susan M 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
linked is the abode Ethic Committee record. In it, they end that no further investigations or court docket situations could be performed, and that is composed of pursuing rates against Hastert. on the comparable time (and without naming names), the record is going directly to criticize many human beings for no longer doing extra to guard the pages or to stop Foley's predatory activities. in spite of the shown fact that, the record is going directly to declare that no person explicitly broke the abode regulations, that's a weasely thank you to declare "many human beings did issues extremely, extremely incorrect, yet we are unlikely to punish everybody." this is yet another occasion of politicians giving one yet another a slap on the wrist for issues that maximum human beings non-politicians might spend time in reformatory for. And if any of the in touch human beings had an oz.. of humility, they too might surrender out of shame for their loss of action & their failure to guard babies of their custody. yet humilty is an enormously uncommon commodity in the U.S. Congress.
2016-12-08 10:27:41 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What scandal??? It is one guy who did something wrong, and everyone, including John Q. Public knew he was a fruitcake from the get-go!!! Ain't you just a tad bit curious is to why this all of the sudden broke right before the elections, or are you that farking stupid??? Could it be that the Dems have no message, no ideas, and are a bunch of spineless jellyfish, and that they are doing everything in their power to take America's attention off of that cold, hard fact??? Get a freaking education, quit listening to your communist college professors and try again, ok??? Thanks!!!
2006-10-07 19:04:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Republicans will NEVER take responsibility. They will pass it off and on to anyone that they can.
2006-10-07 20:59:26 · answer #8 · answered by hamlet_girl_21 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋