Politics & Government - 23 September 2006

-president bush never lied about anything
>we did find WMDs in iraq last april
-some 500 containers of mustard gas
>Bush said that we had reason to believe WMDs were in iraq
-the CIA told him that
>Bush just did what he had to do to protect America
-Bush isn't the one keeping us in iraq
>we are there because we have work to do
>Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
-gives congress power to pull troops out after 90 days
>if they feel the war is unjust
>checks and balances
-president doesn't have power to do very much
-what you say bush did wrong was agreed by liberal congress
-There is NO conspiracy in our government
>its just ridiculous to think that
>again checks and balances
-it is impossible for there to be a conspiracy


just some "misunderstandings" liberals on this site tend to have about our government.
feel free to email me at bolson_07@yahoo.com with any questions

2006-09-23 19:10:19 · 19 answers · asked by THEBurgerKing 4 in Politics

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

Myspace.com/conspiracyalert

2006-09-23 19:07:49 · 13 answers · asked by st911.org 1 in Politics

Should we leave Iraq and let the UN & Arab League takeover the military aspect of the country

We need to pull out and let the UN the Arab League and a small contingent of US forces in Iraq take over. ...

While monitoring the situation from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

As long as we are there we attract terrorist that say Iraq is a puppet state of the US ... like moths to a light we attract terrorist

In 2004 240,000 Iraqis left Iraq for Jordan or Syria
in 2005 400,000 Iraqis immigrated
In 2006 so far over 800,000 have immigrated they are leaving their own country because they are afraid to live there ... something other than status quo has to be done!

Do you agree....

2006-09-23 19:07:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-09-23 19:06:39 · 8 answers · asked by c_lostheman 2 in Other - Politics & Government

"Give to him who begs from you, and do not refuse him who would borrow from you"Jesus favors more government handouts for welfare cheats.

"Judge not, that you be not judged"Jesus is soft on crime

"Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's"Jesus will raise your taxes.

"Do not resist one who is evil. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other"Can we trust Jesus to fight the War on Terror?

Jesus- Wrong on social services Wrong on crime Wrong on defense Wrong for America

2006-09-23 19:05:53 · 11 answers · asked by notdon 1 in Politics

Seems to me she lies about everything .

2006-09-23 19:02:39 · 5 answers · asked by Patches 5 in Civic Participation

if you keep spending billions on weapons and make enemies, and you cut taxes for the rich the country will go into debt and deficit and we will need to pay for it later to our debt holders like China, etc

2006-09-23 19:01:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I am seeing lots of people in both parties who are opposed to this war. I was opposed to going into this war, knowing that Americans have a different value on life than the radical muslim terrorists.

Does the fact that we are in this war and must either win or lose occur to anyone?

Does anyone think that personal opinions about Bush are even relevant to this question?

What do you think? Anyone?

2006-09-23 19:00:02 · 21 answers · asked by ? 7 in Other - Politics & Government

Or. have we all become sheep? Not me....the flag behind me is true.

2006-09-23 18:56:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-09-23 18:55:59 · 4 answers · asked by sanjeet_mustang 1 in Law & Ethics

i read news paper today,osama is dead,it,s real?
I think osama is not dead,is very clever&a good man.
your answers wright.....

2006-09-23 18:54:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I mean without slashing the tire itself, if you just uncap the hose and push away, can the driver charge you?

2006-09-23 18:52:38 · 17 answers · asked by laxeroflax04 2 in Law & Ethics

I promise you the USA will go down in shame just like we did in Vietnam. Soon all the USA troops will eat crow and drink sour milk.

2006-09-23 18:51:52 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-09-23 18:50:52 · 14 answers · asked by Kris 2 in Other - Politics & Government

Hello everyone. I am currently a green card holder, but studying in Japanese University. Since I'll be studying here for two years, I applied for the re-entry permit and already recieved the document from the US customs.
Now, my question is, if I go back home in the US for a holiday or something, will I lose the re-entry permit at the moment I enter the US or can I use it more than one time(meaning come back to the US using the same one without applying for a new permit everytime) if it's within two years?
I wasn't sure about this so I decided to ask here. Any response would be appreciated. Thanks.

2006-09-23 18:50:50 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-09-23 18:48:53 · 12 answers · asked by sueet2b 4 in Other - Politics & Government

why is it that when i talk to people and they find out that i have been down range the first question they always ask me is have i killed someone. is the american public so upsessed with death?

2006-09-23 18:47:41 · 20 answers · asked by redranger1997 2 in Military

2006-09-23 18:47:34 · 13 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics

2006-09-23 18:47:24 · 13 answers · asked by poodie 3 in Government

sing a confesion that you killed a man in 1859?
the would just keep torturing you if you didn't.

2006-09-23 18:44:59 · 8 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics

What im saying is when the oil reserves and gasoline eventually runs out in the future what would happen to the human civilization.

2006-09-23 18:44:32 · 13 answers · asked by regboi45 2 in Government

What is the name of the "Department of Justice" like we have here in the US in Israel. (need it for MUN conference) or some sort of legal/crime sector of government.

2006-09-23 18:44:26 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-09-23 18:44:21 · 1 answers · asked by JAMES 4 in Politics

2006-09-23 18:43:37 · 1 answers · asked by veeyeen_13 1 in Politics

2006-09-23 18:40:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-09-23 18:38:47 · 16 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics

2006-09-23 18:35:33 · 11 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics

2006-09-23 18:35:20 · 3 answers · asked by ozark 1 in Government

The laws are in place to start giving all U.S. citizens full rectal searches passing borders.

Pretty soon Rectal Checks will be as commonplace as the demeaning searches that we now have to endure at airport security.

But U.S. citizens will learn to accept this as police Security.

We've accepted loss or Miranda, loss of 4th amendment.

Now it's your a.s.s.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/318/toomuch.shtml

Florida motorists are watching their rear-view mirrors this week after an appellate court ruled that rectal searches by police are legal. According to the Fifth District Court of Appeals, the removal of 54 grams of cocaine from a suspect's rectum by a member of the Orange County highway drug squad was "part of a legal patdown to make sure the man wasn't armed..." America, land of the free, home of the rectal patdown...


http://www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2002/10/17/UWireDcBureau/D.c-Police.Garner.2nd.Suit.Aclu.Claims.Improper.Search-301349.shtml?norewrite200609240112&sourcedomain=www.gwhatchet.com


Law says 85% of rectal searches done on innocent people

here's the link

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=414&invol=941

This case paves the way to allow police to give everyone a full rectal search.

In another case, he ordered the suppression of heroin
discovered through a warrantless rectal search, even though there
was more than adequate probable cause to believe that the
defendant was carrying heroin in his rectum as he came across the
U.S. border. Kennedy criticized the search as unnecessarily
intrusive, and expressed a desire to protect the privacy rights
of innocent persons against such searches. U.S. v. Cameron. 538
F. 2d 254 (1976).

CRIMINAL LAW - INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - SIXTH AMENDMENT - PREJUDICE

Facts: Appellant, Dwight Evans, appealed the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. A jury convicted Evans of distribution of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute. Evans asserted that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless rectal search of Evans on a public street, in broad daylight, in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Evans argued that his counsel’s performance fell below Strickland’s objective standard of reasonableness. In regard to the prejudice prong of Strickland, Evans asserted that his sentence was enhanced because of counsel’s deficient performance. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City denied Evans’s request.

Held: Reversed. Evans satisfied his burden under both prongs of Strickland. His counsel’s performance fell below objective standards of trial conduct because he failed to seek suppression of evidence obtained by a public rectal search on the street of Baltimore City, which deviated from standard procedural guidelines that protect the integrity and constitutional rights of individuals. This is the case even though Evans’s counsel litigated an equally strong argument regarding Evans’s arrest and search incident to that arrest. In regard to the prejudice suffered by Evans, had his counsel properly sought suppression of the evidence, the two drug charges would have been merged and the detrimental effects of the nine vials of cocaine found in his “rear end” would have ameliorated his sentence. This satisfied Evans’s burden under the prejudice prong of Strickland.

Evans v. State, No. 289, September Term 2001, filed June 25, 2003. Opinion by Sonner, J.

2006-09-23 18:35:02 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-09-23 18:34:08 · 14 answers · asked by smokindoggy 2 in Government