English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

Myspace.com/conspiracyalert

2006-09-23 19:07:49 · 13 answers · asked by st911.org 1 in Politics & Government Politics

James:

No, the hijackers did indeeed turn up alive, There pictures, photos, faces, whatever u wanna call it, were caught by video survallence.

Do a search saying "Hijack suspects alive and well"

2006-09-23 20:15:10 · update #1

13 answers

1. 9 people with the same names turned up alive, but they were not the hijackers - http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,265160-2,00.html
2. The plane would obviously not enter the building whole, but crumple as it hit parts of the building and hence not make a hole the size of the plane. A much smaller missile would have made an even smaller hole.
3. The engines are not missing, they are just not whole, which is to be expected - http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
4. There was no thermite; what suggestion do you possibly have that there was thermite?
5. The put options increase was neither unusual nor excessive. A fairly meager profit was made by the options compared to a typical options trader's profits and several similarly large increases occured over the year before Sep. 11th - http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_20_18/ai_87460027
6. The debris was not sold before it was investigated. FEMA inspected structural columns on 57 separate days after the attacks - http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change-3#overseas-recycling-yards-and-fema
7. Cell phones are currently being phased into use on airliners, most of the phone calls were actually made from Airfones, which are, obviously, designed to work on planes, cell phones were known then to work up to 35,000 feet and even higher, and the calls were dropped often after short intervals, showing that they didn't work all that well. - http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14944.htm
8. The only person who says he was offered millions is William Rodriguez.
9. The towers did not fall at free fall speed - http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
10. Firefighters may have seen explosions, but are in no position to tell an explosion from a bomb.

2006-09-23 20:00:25 · answer #1 · answered by James 7 · 1 0

(1) The "hijackers" (actually alien agents) flew the planes all the way in, but their tinfoil hats protected them.
(2) Most of the "pentagon plane" was instantly teleported just before impact using a modified radar of the type developed in the Philadelphia Experiment and since used only for protection of military buildings.
(3) The top-secret engines were confiscated immediately after the arrival of black-clad Area 51 personel, and whisked back to Hangar 13 in the jumpseats of SR-71 spy planes for further study.
(4) That is what the towers were built from, the Bildenbergers found thermite to be less expensive than steel.
(5) Because Ross Perot needed the money for his daughter's wedding, this time WITHOUT the damned Republicans hassling the guests.
(6) Actually that China bit was just a cover story too, very clever double-deception. It was really used to rebuild the moonscape set, which had deteriorated badly since the 1970's and been junked, so that new space exploration footage could be faked.
(7) They were closer to the bottoms of the flying saucers, which as we all know reflect all man-made electromagntic waves perfectly due to their antigravity drives.
(8) Because he also saw Elvis leaving the building at the same time and that couldn't be allowed to be made public.
(9) The saucers, man! Read #7 fer pete's sake. They gotta push down on SOMETHING.
(10) That stuff from the Pentagon had to be teleported SOMEWHERE, you can't just teleport it to the bottom of the sea 'cuz the water screws the beam all up -- which is why it didn't work quite right in Philly.

That's 10 best answers right there, if I don't get 100 points I'll know its a conspiracy against all of Y!A....

2006-09-24 04:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Mustela Frenata 5 · 0 0

You are persistant I hope you don't think you will convince any one who does not already believe -

I thought about it for quite a while too and wanted people to just look at the way the buildings fell down and how in a free fall it should have taken 5.6 seconds but it took 4.6 because of an internal explotion that pushed the debris down not out the way an object such as a plane hitting it would .

Some will see it others won't some don't care and either way there is nothing you or I can do about it .....

Worry about what they will do next.

If killing 3,000 of thier own didn't matter to them just think what else they are capable of ------

2006-09-24 02:18:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?

A: Which 9 ? Where are they? Where's their interrogation interview? NO PROOF.

How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?

A: Did you take your measuring tape out that day? The hole was just a bit smaller than the one in your head for suggesting anything but a plane (ON VIDEO!) hit the Pentagon. NO PROOF.

Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F

A: The flashpoint temperature of the average commercial jet laden with 90%+ of its fuel is much higher than 2700F, and on top of that, what would have survived the pulverization of 110 floors of concrete. If the WTC could not withstand that impact and heat, how could a little Pratt & Whitney engine? NO PROOF.

Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?

A: Finally a reasonable question. Some may contend that the design of the WTC, like many urban skyscrapers, includes compartmentalized interior/core columns that can house detonation substances. HOWEVER, assuming the substances were there, they would have been planted either during construction (and therefore some degradation of the material may have occurred more than likely) or during the '93 bombing investigation. However, most demolition requires compromising the steel structures beforehand, and applying detonation as the 'last straw'. This requires magnesium strips along the applied thermite, deep in the core of the structure, and then some mechanism to ignite the magnesium. This method, as it concerns the twin towers, is a long shot. The question remains whether wtc7 was demolished after the damage it suffered, or collapsed. But the damage suffered by wtc7 was due to debris from wtc 1 & 2, and it was clear that neither the building (nor the site) was going to be salvaged. The fate of wtc7 is a non-starter.

Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01?

A: The increase in put options was tantamount to about $3million, and had been unclaimed, likely to due to the cessation of trading in NYSE imposed by the SEC. NO PROOF.

Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?

A: The investigation of Ground Zero debris took over two years and pieces were meticulously loaded and carted on to debris trucks with armed escorts to a location in Staten Island, not China. Any sale of material to any nation was done after this investigation took place.


How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?

Tests have been conducted which indicate some reception from local providers up to 8000 ft in altitude. The assumption is the passengers used a cell phone (and not an in-flight phone). Suspicion is commercial aviation is 70+ years old and they've figured out numerous ways to contact officials (company and government) on the ground by then. NO PROOF.

Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?

A: You have no proof shown here of who offered how much to William Rodriguez, who has spoken to the press, FBI, and 9/11 commission and all parties did not find his story plausible or warranting further action (he also said he saw one of the hijackers casing the WTC about 3 months prior). If a thermite detonation did occur seconds before the plane hit the North Tower, why did it take about an hour to collapse? This does not make sense in terms of the physical stresses placed on a building with the complete inner core compromised by the thermite blase (the explosion caused fire to shoot 'up or down' from the elevator shaft, burning one of Rodriguez's coworkers, with 14 witnesses to the event). Until you can explain how a 110 story tower stands upright after the basement supports are compromised, I can't find plausibility in this assertion. NO PROOF.

Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?

The South Tower's floors above the impact zone fell over (not down) as the building collapsed. If you've reviewed the engineering schematic of the buildings, they are loosely tied floors to steel skeleton and inner beams. The floors were light-weight and flexible attached to the inner and outer structures and therefore you'd see significant acceleration of these floors as they pancaked, essentially as if the building fell through air with no resistance (i.e. gravity).

Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

A: See 2nd link below, this firefigher HEARD explosions after sending some of their squad up to the highest floor the one working elevator would take them to. The explosions were heard, not seen. In a burning building, constructed such as the twin towers were, explosions are not out of the norm (flashovers are also typical). This is likely what was witnessed, albeit from ground level (see 3rd link below). If detonation was employed, it would be at the inner core and closer to the base of the building, not the middle of it (in plain sight from ground level) as the fireman interviewed (3rd link below) asserts. AGAIN NO PROOF.

I had worked in the South Tower for almost two years. I know the floors were very lightweight, flexible and able to house all sorts of wires and piping to enable computer and phone systems to be easily installed or repaired. The building swayed and shook with a strong wind, and was clearly built to withstand natural pressures, not exploding planes and pulverized concrete pancaking.

I know it is difficult to imagine that this event could take place on our soil, given our military and law enforcement apparatus. But our complacency and political hopscotching put our country in a precarious position, way BEFORE 9/11. This is a trying event for our generation and the history of our country. As fun and intriguing as it may be to point to internal conspiracies, the reality is that four planes were hijacked and run into targets or the ground that day. They were piloted by maniacal and homicidal individuals with no value placed on human life. The transgressor here is radical Islam. THAT movement bears all responsibility, and trying to concoct an internally executed conspiracy with flimsy references to unsubstantiated claims is a poor way to show your support for those who died and for those who are following and capturing the perpetrators who are still alive (none of the hijackers have been found alive to date).

2006-09-24 03:24:38 · answer #4 · answered by rohannesian 4 · 1 0

Let me answer your questions the best way possible for a liberal person with your paranoia can understand.
1) Are those voices back and keeping you awake?
2) Did you ever get over having the other kids in kindergarten give you wedgies daily?
3) Did you run out of medication again?
4) Which of your seven personalities am I talking to?
5) What color is the sky in your world?
6) Are you doing meth again?
7) You still having problems with the fact President Bush won both elections?
8) When one flew over the coo coos nest were they talking about you?

2006-09-24 02:20:54 · answer #5 · answered by dwh320 2 · 1 1

There were no planes and no hijackers - see below.
It was a missile that hit the pentagon.
No plane, therefore no engines.
Thermite was used in the controlled demolition.
The perpetrators knew before hand and wanted to make money on the stock exchange.
Evidence sols as part of the cover-up.
No planes, no passengers, no cell phones.
William Rodriguez offered money as part of cover-up
Towers fell at speed of gravity because all controlled demolitions fall that way.
The firefighters saw reality
Larry Silverstein made a mistake.

Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html

2006-09-24 06:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your questions are all unadulterated bullshit. Where did you get this pure crap? From an internet site? The guy who runs the site is a deadbeat. Stop with the 9/11 crap and let's move on to the next atrocity.

2006-09-24 02:12:59 · answer #7 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 3 2

The answers are there if you truly want to know. These are all claims from Loose Change.

Heres a start. People believe what they want to believe but facts dont lie.

2006-09-24 02:14:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There are definitely questions that need answers. One of the answers above sends you to a video that "debunks" the conspiracy, but they just prove that too. Something bad is happening.

2006-09-24 04:23:24 · answer #9 · answered by icetender 3 · 0 1

The question is as to why these questions remain unanswered

2006-09-24 02:12:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers