most would say if reasons present themself to invade a country, then you can invade it... but Republicans seem to take an opposite approach, find a country and then come up with enough eveidence to go in...
Iraq for example... no real links to 9-11 compared to other countries in the area.... but doggone it, we're going to come up with something... then the WMD, then the humanitarian efforts, now the links to terror...
next seems to be Iran... links to terror, nuclear program in early development possibly, crazy leader...
it's like a selling game... choose a country then "sell the war" to the people and U.N.... do they have a dart and a world map or something?
I mean, is Osama not a larger threat... he's already killed 3,000 in 9-11? or N. Korea... they already have nukes and are working on delivery methods? I mean the entire 9-11 report gives many more reasons to invade several countries than they ever come up with for Iraq and more than they are coming up with for Iran?
2006-09-15
18:55:09
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Other - Politics & Government