If you knew he was dangerous and that he would kill innocent people in the future.(Prison is not a option.)
2006-09-15 19:19:12 · 13 answers · asked by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes... HELL YES, no questions asked! He is pure evil! And Clinton should have fried his as$ when he got the chance!
2006-09-15 19:32:51 · answer #1 · answered by mommymoore06 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh yeah forgot to mention this...
That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be.
That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies.
Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true.
That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America’s emergency response.
2006-09-15 19:25:02 · answer #2 · answered by dstr 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we got to go back in time with our way back time machines, then yes - I would kill him to save the lives lost at the hands of OBL. But it is a moot point - not many on the earth can see the future.
2006-09-15 19:24:26 · answer #3 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could've, would have, should've..........The one I hear the most complaint about is the time with the Saudi prince.........At the time would it have been wise to bomb that location knowing that an emissary was send my an ally possibly to bring him home. Something that could net a knowledgeable source on this newly emerging threat.
2006-09-15 19:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by Glune 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Clinton, who was elected, tried to kill bin Laden. Ronald Reagan and Bush's father put Al Qaeda and bin Laden in business, he gave them support in their war v. the USSR, so if you want somebody to blame for 9-11 the answer is Ronald Reagan and Bush 1. Unequivocally--its their fault, they did it.
2006-09-15 19:23:29 · answer #5 · answered by jxt299 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Would have killed him any day after 2.26.93
Mrcricket1932 is a revisionist moron probably works for ABC. See below.
2006-09-15 19:24:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, no questions asked!
2006-09-15 19:21:51 · answer #7 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was offered the guy on 3 different occasions.. but he settled for his usual response.
2006-09-15 19:24:25 · answer #8 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes..
2006-09-15 19:22:03 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
yes the reword say dead or alive
2006-09-15 20:56:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋