English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 10 August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

Is it really right to arrest somebody if he/she was planning a crime? What if the criminal-to-be changes his mind meantime? Shouldn't we only arrest people if there was a real attempt? (Shooting at the victim, for example.)

2006-08-10 03:01:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

will china,russia,n-korea keeps quiet at the western influence in middle east?

2006-08-10 03:00:49 · 9 answers · asked by ragava 1 in Other - Politics & Government

the child care worker grabbed him by this shirt a gragged him also and the put him towards the window and shouted at him to sit in the corner.The centre told me by phone 13 days after it had happend to my son.I requested a copy of the incident report because another staff member witnessed the incident and made a compaint to the director of this centre.The board as now told me in writing that this women will be getting her job back and she will be under supervision for 6 months then she will return to normal duties. i want to get advice of what civil action i can take against this women and this childcare because this physical abuse as happend to my baby and i need urgent advice from anyone whom may have law experience or my have happend to their child and what is the procedure pleade this is urgent!

2006-08-10 02:59:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-08-10 02:59:42 · 3 answers · asked by Republicans_R_Immoral_And_Stupid 1 in Other - Politics & Government

The Time of Troubles begins with a period of geological shifts. Frequent earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and disrupted weather systems become the norm. This will cause widespread famines and droughts, and social upheavals in unexpected places. Nations that are considered prosperous and powerful, particularly western nations, will be weakened. They will be torn with civil strife and rioting as people migrate to areas that have water and can support crop-growing. The social upheaval and weakening of political structures will help the Antichrist come to power.

The United States in particular will be subject to serious natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and flooding, and flatten the nation from end to end, causing enormous conflict, despair, and misery. The US will be bankrupted attempting to deal with its disasters. Three other great nations will send aid to help the citizens survive.
Any comments or insights or enlightenment welcome. Thanks.

2006-08-10 02:58:54 · 6 answers · asked by easyboy 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-08-10 02:58:45 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

they say if you expect nothing from life you also get nothing, you expect alot in life you will also get alot out of life? does it really work that way?

2006-08-10 02:58:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-08-10 02:57:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

under pressure from israel? nothin else makes sense!!!!
they dont wanna show their ppl what attrocities israel is doin right now!!!!!!
well this is what u can expect from a racist country like india (dont forget the gujrat genocide)!

2006-08-10 02:56:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Because of all the things that seems to be directed at the main stream U.K. people.
The good Muslims of the U.K. must be feeling sick with all of the things that are going on.
Violence will follow at some time because the non Muslims of the U.K. are pushing us into a corner and the only way out will be violence.
What Do You Think?????????

2006-08-10 02:56:34 · 22 answers · asked by CATWEAZLE242 2 in Immigration

Would most of us feel like we need to renew the war on terror or would we feel like thats what got us into this in the first place? Would we rally behind Bush again or would we blame him? Whats your opinion?

2006-08-10 02:56:27 · 16 answers · asked by Chris D 4 in Military

to break up muslim protests. I think that they should.

2006-08-10 02:55:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

I see tons of ignorant claims of ridiculous conspiracies and trying to put the most obsurd suggestions on here. I am just letting you know that I ignore and wont waste my time commenting. I see most of it from the anti-bush sector. Who else agrees that we should keep this open for intelligent debate and actually questions and opinions?

2006-08-10 02:54:22 · 10 answers · asked by ESPforlife 2 in Other - Politics & Government

It seems the U.S decided to capture middle-east oil wealth through Israel.If so,the whole oil importer for the world is America,and there wil bel no one to question them......

2006-08-10 02:52:13 · 11 answers · asked by ragava 1 in Military

2006-08-10 02:51:48 · 20 answers · asked by May 2 in Politics

I think Prohabition was a pretty bad idea.

2006-08-10 02:50:26 · 25 answers · asked by Jordan Bucher 3 in Government

We have planes headed from England that possibly could of caused major damage to our country. Why cant people see we are at war with terrorism and those prisoners in Cuba were not trying to sell us girl scout cookies but cause serious harm.

2006-08-10 02:49:25 · 8 answers · asked by paki 5 in Other - Politics & Government

(just asking by the way - no plans of my own :)

2006-08-10 02:48:48 · 9 answers · asked by Askin 1 in Law & Ethics

I'm not talking here concerning today's breaking news but rather the disproportionate number of Scottish socialists in Westminster. I've just been listening to two Labour spokesmen spouting about today's events and, of course, both were Scots, namely Reid and Alexander. No doubt Blair, Brown etc will be getting their oars in later. Even as a wholly patriotic Scot I'm beginning to think too much is too much.

heavenlyhaggis

2006-08-10 02:48:42 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

reagan with the cold war, bush with terrorism. bush sr. and bob dole didnt resort to scaring people and lost to bill clinton.

2006-08-10 02:48:23 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

Most of the questions can be answered on Wikipedia, the answers are mostly mis spelled and ill informed. Sometimes I despair...

2006-08-10 02:46:31 · 24 answers · asked by keirboy 2 in Politics

funny how we went without orange, yellow, purple, red, or any color alerts sonce the 2004 election, now they suddenly appear before the mid-term elections. shameful.

2006-08-10 02:45:43 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

upgrading your nations and promote technical assistance and improve your ecnonomies

2006-08-10 02:45:16 · 7 answers · asked by interested 4 in Other - Politics & Government

Does anyone know if a small business is required by building code to have hot and cold water, by building code in Texas??

2006-08-10 02:44:19 · 1 answers · asked by jasonzbtzl 4 in Government

2006-08-10 02:43:45 · 2 answers · asked by nailla 1 in Politics

Many liberals appear not to take the wider, global battle against Islamic fanaticism seriously. They see Iraq purely as a symptom of a cynical and politicized right-wing response to Sept. 11, as opposed to a tragic misstep in a bigger conflict.

In fact, JIHAD has been waged against the West since Muhammad died only 1,400 years ago.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan don't like the methods of Al Qaeda because they prefer the strategic long-term tactic of INVASION BY IMMIGRATION.

In 1968, liberals refused to acknowledge the Communist threat. Today, recent events point to the growing influence within the Left that is unmoved by the fight against global jihad.

ONLY WHEN THE LEFT AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA REALIZE THAT WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE AT RISK OF JIHAD WILL THE FIGHT FINALLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.

2006-08-10 02:43:04 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

fedest.com, questions and answers