Politics & Government - 9 August 2006

Do you really think that any type of government can just be transplanted without considering local conditions. Are you really so arrogant that you will force us with your arms to accept YOUR type of freedom? How is that different from a dictator forcing his viewpoint on us?

2006-08-09 18:44:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-08-09 18:42:08 · 24 answers · asked by janemarsdel 1 in Politics

Ohh sorry, I forgot you didnt buy it but STOLE IT from someone else. and now you say its yours, pleaseeeeeeeee

2006-08-09 18:36:38 · 20 answers · asked by Jordan 3 in Immigration

2006-08-09 18:35:35 · 14 answers · asked by jamn_john49 1 in Politics

It seems everytime something happens, they the 1st to try stomping on our mighty feet. I think a good pimp slapping is in order.......Can I get an AMEN???? [Back to freedom fries]

2006-08-09 18:35:01 · 11 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics

2006-08-09 18:34:14 · 6 answers · asked by Manbearpig 1 in Politics

2006-08-09 18:29:02 · 9 answers · asked by profile image 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-09 18:26:30 · 1 answers · asked by Manbearpig 1 in Politics

alot of pro -illegals make claim that Americans are self centered, and we are trying to stop them from improving their lives ... yet by improving their lives by entering America illegally they are wrecking our future ...

does it not seem to you, that they are the ones that areonly concerned for them selves and could careless for those they tresspass aginst ?

2006-08-09 18:21:47 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Guns don't kill people, people kill people. True or False? Why? I want a good reason behind your answer!!!

2006-08-09 18:18:34 · 15 answers · asked by Jessica 4 in Law & Ethics

I'm just curious to see who really know what they are talking about.

2006-08-09 18:12:38 · 9 answers · asked by haterade 3 in Other - Politics & Government

The answer is clearly NO, but I won't to hear what the disbelievers have to say... An invasion of America would be impossible. Even if the entire world came crashing down on America with a massive coalition, it would still be impossible. And yes, i am accounting for the possibility that Canada and Mexico join this inevitably doomed coalition. Other countries with aircraft carriers and transport planes, (assuming they have any), would be blown out of the water or sky before they got within 2,000 miles of either coast. Hell, for that matter our Coast Guard could take on just about anything the world could throw at us...In fact, lol,,,the Coast Guard is larger than the Royal Navy...so just think about that for sec....Bottom line, if you cannot land troops on American soil...you cannot beat us...But if you think we can be invaded...I would love to hear how...Adults only please..

2006-08-09 18:09:59 · 59 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Military

2006-08-09 18:09:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Should you start slowing down as soon as you see it or after you enter it? How far must you be able to see to read a speed limit sign legally?

2006-08-09 18:08:16 · 7 answers · asked by rascoe627 1 in Law & Ethics

Ohh come in a legal way !!! if it would be easy dont you think everybody would come in a legal way idiots.

Calling criminals to people that just want a better life, you are the freaking criminals judging and condemning.

If you dont know why people freaking inmigrate dont talk crap, when you live in a third world country you may have a point of view of why people inmigrate.

But if you havent got out of the center of the universe ( thats what most of stupid americans think the US is) then stop talking crap.

Criminals are those who make harsh to people, like kill, steal, rape. No someone that just wanna work, its stupid. then everyone that buy a bootleg dvd its a criminal, everyone that goes over the speed limit is a criminal, everyone that download a song without paying is a criminal. those are minor offenses and so are inmigration laws. he without sin cast the first stone !!!!

2006-08-09 18:06:28 · 26 answers · asked by Jordan 3 in Immigration

come on!

2006-08-09 18:05:14 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-08-09 18:01:57 · 7 answers · asked by michinoku2001 7 in Military

2006-08-09 17:56:34 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

during the last presidetal race bush said that kerry was a flip floper
i find it odd how these parties flip flop on issues
i declare that both parties do their share of flip floping
the nucular idea is not a new idea. it was suggested when the dems where last in power. (oddly enought i thought the dems had no new ideasi guess both parties dont)
the nucular idea was suggested to speed up the congress by lessing the effect of the minority. when the dems where in power the right was against it and now that the right is in power they are for it
hummm now what is that saying that come to mind ... something about a pot and a kettal

2006-08-09 17:56:13 · 4 answers · asked by specal k 5 in Government

2006-08-09 17:53:16 · 14 answers · asked by cheeziecon 1 in Politics

So many brainwashed people saying Joe has guts and integrity. The man is arrogant and ambitious, saw the tide was running to the right and decided to float with it too far, that's all.

2006-08-09 17:52:14 · 2 answers · asked by Noitall 2 in Politics

2006-08-09 17:45:18 · 9 answers · asked by patrick f 1 in Law & Ethics

racist, then the California Speaker called anti-illegal immigration advocates 'crackers' and now when the Californian Republican Representatives want to hold hearings in the State to find out Californians views on illegal immigration, "A spokesman for Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez responded that "these self-appointed vigilantes" are trying to inflame a sensitive issue at a critical time, using an unprecedented, one-party panel that may violate legislative rules and fair political practice laws -- assertions dismissed by the GOP."

http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_4157765?source=rss

So Assembly Representatives holding hearings are 'vigilantes'? That is truly a new use of the word, in my experience.

I was always taught that when you have to call names, you are losing the argument.....

What do you think?

2006-08-09 17:43:39 · 7 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Immigration

Small groups, doctors, government, companys seem to wish to control the population. Some are good, restrict the honest person too much. Today it is over weight, do they have a right to tell to diet? Smoking, is this a way not to treat the smoker and try to kill them off. Laws are past against weapons, weapons do dot hurt, it is the criminal who does and are armed. White collar crime, they do not go to jail. Most just get fired. The lower class and ill people go to jail, they can not defend themselves no funds. The trend is we find our srlves with too few rights with a poor excluse protecting us. I would rather have risk and live free, is not what America was in the past.

2006-08-09 17:41:49 · 13 answers · asked by Geo 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-08-09 17:41:37 · 17 answers · asked by jake730_99 2 in Military

2006-08-09 17:38:13 · 15 answers · asked by DmanLT21 5 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-08-09 17:37:44 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

http://www.zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/

This even totally surprised me! I can't trust liberal journalists any longer!

Is it surprising that Journalists are overrun by liberals (frauds)?

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=829


More fraud
http://newsbusters.org/

2006-08-09 17:37:14 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-08-09 17:37:03 · 6 answers · asked by CARL 1 in Other - Politics & Government

I personally don't know if Bush is racist or not. After Katrina some celebraties started to say that Bush hates Black people. This kind of talk has penatrated my high school and even some of my wacko liberal teachers have joined in the ordeal. Why do so many people make these accusations?

2006-08-09 17:34:59 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics