Politics & Government - 23 June 2006

Some one sued and win in the court by hook and trick. any way he did the writ and took the part of it from the bank with the help of sheriff now what else can he do ?canhe come after my spouse a/c the sued is in my name only. Pl help me. I am so much depressed.
Thanks

2006-06-23 09:10:53 · 17 answers · asked by anand_ghiya 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-06-23 09:10:26 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-06-23 09:07:43 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-06-23 09:05:44 · 18 answers · asked by xmas90 4 in Military

2006-06-23 09:05:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

For being straight, since this is really the big issue with gay marriage. It's not about "morality" it's about legal protection under the law.

Fourteenth Amendment

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Read this last part again:
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

2006-06-23 09:04:41 · 2 answers · asked by collegedebt 3 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-23 09:01:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Its a well known fact that the USA has the most Weapons of Mass Destruction on the planet, yet for some reason they feel they should be allowed to keep them while other nations who don't do what the USA want shouldn't be allowed to...

as for Iraq they had weapons that the USA had given them before, that were no where near the deadly scale that the USA have (or North Korea), so what is the USA's fascination with pissing off the world?

just wondering.....

2006-06-23 09:00:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

just jokin

2006-06-23 08:57:09 · 5 answers · asked by million$moufpiece 2 in Government

ive seen so many!! y??

2006-06-23 08:53:56 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 removes barriers to all qualified registered voters regardless of race, physical disabilities, or profiency of language. Some Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives refused to debate the matter, although it was guarenteed to pass.

2006-06-23 08:53:18 · 24 answers · asked by mediahoney 6 in Politics

http://www.pmw.org.il/LatestBulletins.htm#b220606

Why exactly are sending money to Hamas who is quite open about trying to destroy us? Muslims are out in the open about trying to conquer the US and other western countries and either kill us all or force us to submit to slavery under Islam.

Isn't it time we shut down all the mosques in our country and forcibly deported these people? For God's sake we just caught them trying to bring about another 9/11, this time with the Sears Tower.

Isn't enough, ENOUGH already? These people can't co-exist with us. Their ridiculous cult of death and depravity won't let them.

2006-06-23 08:50:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-06-23 08:50:24 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-06-23 08:49:48 · 8 answers · asked by wildheavenfarm 3 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-23 08:49:11 · 10 answers · asked by © 2007. Sammy Z. 6 in Other - Politics & Government

Since Marriage orginated from religion, why should any marriage mean anything to the government? I think it should be called a Civil Union, wether it is between a man and a woman, or man and man, or woman and woman. Wouldn't that eliminate the argument? If a man and woman wanted to get married, they could still go to their church and get married, but there would be a separate document involving the state, that would be a 'civil union document'. If two men wanted to get married, they would have to find a church willing to do so, but it wouldn't matter, because they could go to the courthouse and get a 'civil union' anyway. This would keep from offending christians and other religious people, because you would still only be able to get "married" if you are man and woman, yet it wouldn't really mean anything outside of church, just like a batism or confirmation. Yet gays could have a civil union, and obtain the same rights as what is now a marriage. Does anybody agree?

2006-06-23 08:46:47 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

I DONT GET...HOW CAN THEY BE THE MOST TRUSTED NEWS STATION IN THE WORLD WHEN THEY CANT EVEN GET THEIR STORY RIGHT....THEIR NO TERROIST IN THIS COUNTRY..ONLY ONE BIG TERROIST ...AND THAT IS U.S..

2006-06-23 08:44:39 · 6 answers · asked by dave 1 in Government

2006-06-23 08:43:42 · 7 answers · asked by jenugotmail 2 in Civic Participation

2006-06-23 08:40:57 · 14 answers · asked by seffertanner 3 in Politics

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622191218.0qmfazt6.html - Read it and weep Neo-Cons, BUSH STILL LIED!!! Another election year trick down the tubes LOL

2006-06-23 08:40:57 · 13 answers · asked by allyson71377 3 in Government

2006-06-23 08:39:39 · 1 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics

His politics, his passion, his films, his books, his humor or lack there of..

2006-06-23 08:37:20 · 16 answers · asked by Hafeman 5000 4 in Politics

Who cares if a woman wants to sell her body. I personally wouldn't do such an act but all this drama with prostitution is leading to wealthy pimps and pimpettes. If the government would stay out of petty business such as prostitution and worry about our public school system, high taxes and this darn war with Iraq which is making gas prices soar, we would be a lot better off.

2006-06-23 08:36:51 · 14 answers · asked by amissybell 4 in Government

Often people will say an action or inaction is "wrong" simply because it's against the law. What do you think. Is breaking the law malum in se (wrong by nature) or are some laws actually immoral?

2006-06-23 08:36:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I have researched the 9/11 conspiracy and many others for quite some time. Who else believes that the U.S. had something to do with it so they could take away more of our right for so called protection nad set in play terror for martial law so we can be more closely watched and controlled.

2006-06-23 08:36:18 · 28 answers · asked by joe d 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Forget the fact that the station they were on was powered by a hamster on a wheel connected to a 15 watt generator, but nevermind that...is it a bad thing that they couldn't maintain a high enough audience share in the ATL to stay on the air? Isn't this the way a free market works? Or should this be the catalyst for a communist style application of the so-called "fairness doctrine"? If liberalism is so competitive, why can't their mouthpiece in the radio world succeed without donations and help from wealthy limousine liberals? I look forward to being called names by all of the enlightened and tolerant lefties here. Cheers!

2006-06-23 08:33:27 · 14 answers · asked by Annoying American 5 in Other - Politics & Government

The mumbling fraternity drunk's ultraliberal nationbuilding to justify his What So Proudly We Halliburton war has turned into sucker bait set by Al Qaida. As in Vietnam (which the girly-man Republicans chickened out of serving in), we are fighting to liberate people who want to kill us. Iraq is the right war in the wrongest possible place.

2006-06-23 08:33:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I was served papers that I could be evicted if violations were NOT corrected. 3 were done immediately but the 4th. one...a lg. Oak Tree and cracked driveway are way beyond my finances as I am ederly & live on Soc. Sec.
Have been trying to contact The Dept. of Business & Professional Regulations of Tallahasee, Fl. but with no luck on the PC.

2006-06-23 08:32:45 · 6 answers · asked by lois r 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-23 08:29:48 · 18 answers · asked by purple_dogs_bed 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

All of the bible thumpers, Bush included, seem to think that if the Bible says marriage is between a man and a woman, then so should our Constitution. But wasn't America founded by people looking to keep religion out of government? Gay marriage's detractors seem to have forgotten about the Separation of Church and State.

2006-06-23 08:28:57 · 40 answers · asked by Jake 2 in Law & Ethics