http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622191218.0qmfazt6.html - Read it and weep Neo-Cons, BUSH STILL LIED!!! Another election year trick down the tubes LOL
2006-06-23 08:40:57 · 13 answers · asked by allyson71377 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
By the way, this article was posted on www.drudgereport.com - a extremely right-wing biased website
2006-06-23 08:42:47 · update #1
so enough of the 'liberal media' crap - this was from your buddies LOL
2006-06-23 08:46:13 · update #2
The weapons found predated the Kuwait invasion and there is nothing found that post dated it! These weapons were there for over 13 years! How can that possibly be used to prove anything?
Please ask George Bush to identify, locate and present a breakdown of all current weapons, weapons technology and the location and amount of those which are no longer used but are stored in the US and any other country where our military is found!
The idiocy of all this is that Reagan took Saddam off the terrorist list in the 1980's in order for him to purchase weapons and arranged loans for him to do that. Because some of the weapons may not have come from the US, the money to buy them did, and Reagan's removal of Saddam from the list allowed him to buy them,
Cheney and Halliburton were deeply involved with Iraq!
2006-06-23 08:55:54 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Whether they are expired, degraded, damaged, whatever, does not really change the fact that they are there. Nor is anyone really trying to go out and say "See, Bush didn't lie." and that's because all sane people know Bush never did lie. It's just a Democrat bumper sticker. Bush (and many, many others) got intell saying there were WMD and they did what they thought was correct.
Furthermore, does it really matter if they were good or not? We live in this country where an iPod and a baggie of animal crackers left behind on an airplane is enough to clear the airport and blow up some lady's purse out on the tarmac. Can you imagine if Saddam had ever taken one of those dud bombs and claimed he had smuggled it into the US somehow? There would be total chaos.
WMD or no WMD, the world is better with Sodamn Insane locked up.
2006-06-23 09:20:57 · answer #2 · answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess you know all about weeping. Your still crying because the DemonCats lost the last two elections. Just because the munitions are too old to use as is does not mean they couldn't easily be rearmed with a fresh batch of sarin. Hussein had plenty of warning we were coming. Don't you think he would have moved/hid everything he could before that time came. Would you keep your stash of drugs laying out on the dining room table if you knew the police were on their way to throw your hippy **** into jail. Of course not. Please use what the good Lord placed between your ears and quit trying to revive the 60's (they weren't that great).
2006-06-23 08:47:40 · answer #3 · answered by Doug B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about instead of spreading hate and animosity, why don't you maybe try and help find a common ground between the parties? All things like what you posted do is make the country worse because people refuse to comprimise. Stop spreading hate and how about actually working on the problem instead of blaming someone.
2006-06-23 08:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This just proves what I've always thought. Republicans are such cowards that even weapons that don't work scare the hell out of them. I don't see any Democrats crapping themselves over these out-dated, non-functioning fireworks!
It's got to be a miserable way to live, being scared and paranoid all the time. Maybe that's why they never leave their home with out a gun!
2006-06-23 09:24:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm... yeah the WMD's are still hidden in Libya.
That's what Saddam's sole surviving general said BOTH on Fox News AND The Daily Show (to cover both ends)
2006-06-23 08:44:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush did not lie. He reported and responded to intelligence that the Clintons (Hillary and Bill...Members of the vast right wing conspiracy?...not so much!) also believed. To lie, one must know it is false and declare it to be true. Bush did not know it was false.
Bush made a mistake? Yes. Intelligence was bad? Yes. Lied? Not on this one.
2006-06-23 08:45:56 · answer #7 · answered by optionseeker1989 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If credible reports of WMD's were found it really would have made the news. Not just the websites that feature the bald guy doing the splits in spandex.
2006-06-23 08:43:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberal ***** always open and spewing crap all over the place.Read more into it,not just the parts that make you all happy about it.
2006-06-23 08:45:23 · answer #9 · answered by jarbowski 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't blame Bush on this one. I blame Santorum. He'll still lose-it would take a miracle.
2006-06-23 08:42:05 · answer #10 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋