Its a well known fact that the USA has the most Weapons of Mass Destruction on the planet, yet for some reason they feel they should be allowed to keep them while other nations who don't do what the USA want shouldn't be allowed to...
as for Iraq they had weapons that the USA had given them before, that were no where near the deadly scale that the USA have (or North Korea), so what is the USA's fascination with pissing off the world?
just wondering.....
2006-06-23 09:00:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The evil neocons in and out of the Bush administration most likely believe as did Brain in Pinky and the Brian: they are trying to take over the world. The way they sell their lies to the American public, who dutifully swallow, is actually quite brilliant. Nonetheless, it is immoral and evil.
2006-06-23 09:07:48 · answer #1 · answered by Michael R 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What is "hypocite"? If your trying to say hypocrite, you still have it wrong. The USA has been dismantling it's WMD after an agreement was signed with Russia a few years ago.
Wrong again! North Korea does not have WMD. They are posturing the free world with this three stage missle crap. Just trying to get more food for their starving population. Probably just a black powder rocket given to them by Red China.
Pissing off who? The French? hahahaha !!!
Better study history instead of listening to the drive-by media, dude. If it wasn't for the USA you wouldn't even be able to ask a question. You would be speaking German (if the SS didn't kill you) or Japanese right now.
2006-06-23 09:11:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hypocrisy?
The United States is the most generous, tolerant nation on earth. No matter what the offense committed against us, we actively help former enemies with huge amounts of aid.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, did the U.S. say, "Hey, you've put us and the rest of the world through hell, now it's payback time"? Not even close. We helped them transition to a democratic, capitalist form of government.
Can you imagine if the situation had been reversed and the Soviets had won the Cold War? Soviet tanks would have been running down Pennsylvania Avenue, and 50,000 "advisors" sent here to monitor our government. The Soviets would have demanded ruinous "reparations" from us, like France and England demanded of Germany after WWI. What did the U.S. do? We offered them the hand of friendship.
After WWII, we didn't leave Germany and Japan to languish. We poured massive amounts of aid into these countries so they could prosper.
The U.S. acts with compassion and self-restraint, but the same cannot be said of many volatile countries across the globe.
If the world honestly considered the U.S. as dangerous and vindictive, it wouldn't so brazenly and gleefully piss us off all the time.
2006-06-23 09:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems like spelling is an issue... particularly when you mis-spell the name of the company which you have been a "project manager" in for 14 years!!
For reference everybody, this person says they have been a project manager in Exxon Mobile for 14 years........except the company is Exxon Mobil ( its oil and gas not phones) and nobody stays a project manager for 14 years in one company unless they have been kidnapped.....
Come clean!!!
What are you really and why do you want to slag the U.S off without facts?
Also please list all the weapons of U.S origin which were supplied to Iraq, because I cannot find any.
Unless of course they supplied;
Russian tanks
Russian planes
French and Russian Helicopters
Chinese handguns
French anti air systems
Russian rifles and machine guns
French APC's
etc etc
Show us the evidence!!!
2006-06-24 11:56:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only nations that the US is trying to bar atomic weapons from are those who signed an agreement not to produce them.
It's like any contract, those nations were given contracts and considerations for not making atomic weapons.
It's like taking all the goodies, then refuse to pay.
2006-06-23 09:15:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes, the biggest kid in class takes it upon himself to become the "policeman", breaking up fights and rescuing cats from trees. And sometimes the biggest kid becomes a bully.
Most of the time, the truth lays somewhere between the two.
And it's "HYPOCRITE", not "HYPOCITE", LOL. If you must rant, at least use the "check spelling" function!
2006-06-23 09:03:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off its hypocrite and second its not like the USA is hiding the fact that they have weapons like that and its not like we blow up people for fun! Think before you speak stupid
2006-06-23 09:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because even though we have them we won't use them. If we wanted to we could have and there wouldn't have been a war at all. then the rest of the world would be bitching about that. these countries are actually threats to society. I hope that clears thing up for you damn non americans
2006-06-23 09:12:12 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You mean always saving the world and those people who can't stand up for themselves........Yeah we're always called to DUTY...Give us protection, Give us Money, Give us help, then we'll come to your country the U.S.A. and we'll demand that our customs, traditions, beliefs etc. etc. etc. become mainstream and to heck with your American ways.......
Don't like it leave..........Find a better country...or hey here's a thought "MAN UP" and fix your own damned country!!!! We had to and it cost us lots of blood........
2006-06-23 09:07:11 · answer #9 · answered by Sad1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because bush is runnig the country and he is stupid i mean realy stupid you will most proberly find he is just making it up as he goes on i think that if the us are allowed missile testing then so is korea bush is and @ss hole
2006-06-23 09:07:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋