I asked this a little while ago, but I think that I was not clear enough. I just saw a documentary about World Health Organization doctors treating an ebola epidemic in Africa. After the first wave of infection and death, there were a few infected villagers who pulled thru and recovered. When there was a smaller secondary outbreak, some of the doctors did transfusions from the survivors to the new cases. And all the transfusion receipients survived. Why can't this technique be used to cure any disease, as long as their is one person who has overcome it?
I am not refering to a full blood replacement, but rather the normal transfusion of a few pints from the disease survivor to the currently infected. And I am not asking if this would be a good panacea technique, but rather if it could work for some infectious diseases that we have no better treatments for.
2006-09-17
10:51:16
·
5 answers
·
asked by
juicy_wishun
6