he said they were overgrown and it looked like a jungle. I thought I should have at least been asked to trim them or warned, but instead they were actually removed from the ground and now it's dirt and grass. There are other plants that are overgrown on the premises, but they were not trimmed, and definitely not removed. Now the landlord doesn't want to pay for new plants. And the handyman gets an attitude with me like they were "a jungle" to justify his decision to remove the plants. The landlord apparently did not give any instruction either way. My question is, is this legal, to remove someone's property, even though my plants (my property) were in the ground (landlord's property). Anyway, I am pissed and don't have the money to start all over with 5 years worth of gardening. Seriously, all it needed was to be trimmed, and all they needed to do was ask. Please help me understand if this if justified for them, or legal.
2007-03-08
06:09:11
·
5 answers
·
asked by
courtneyoquist
1