Philosophy - September 2007

Who knows what the caveman knew?

2007-09-27 05:34:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 05:10:14 · 14 answers · asked by >o_OStarry Eyed>VandazZ 3

2007-09-27 04:47:57 · 32 answers · asked by One long Holiday 1

2007-09-27 04:22:04 · 15 answers · asked by Rita 6

2007-09-27 04:19:33 · 28 answers · asked by Rita 6

2007-09-27 04:16:18 · 1 answers · asked by rose 1

this lady doesn't know me or any of my prof. and i never showed up during the lessons because i had to take other classes at the time and so today after the oral exam she said i should always be this positive/happy (referring to my attitude). it's weird she would say this isn't it and why. thanx

2007-09-27 03:50:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

choose either the right hand road to virture & wisdom or the ledt hand path to worldliness and vice???Which path have you chose???

2007-09-27 03:30:21 · 16 answers · asked by Rita 6

In general, in life - why can't we all just tell eachother the truth. Not to hurt or shock but just to feel better about the lies that we eventually end up telling to the ones we love. Am I alone in wanting a better more open life?

I enjoy looking at blonde women in pigtials, I like the thought of another man pleasuring me with his tongue and I wish i was part of a gang that got rich from robbing a bank and then moved to Brazil.

Why can't we all be honest? What stops us?

2007-09-27 03:30:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 03:27:40 · 13 answers · asked by Rita 6

What is the language game?

2007-09-27 03:15:36 · 3 answers · asked by philosopherpikachu 1

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20070927/sc_space/meteoritecrashbreedsmasshysteria

This is a story about a bunch of idiots who suffered from mass hysteria. Does mass hysteria both anyone else?? Doesn't it show how stupid people are sometimes?

2007-09-27 03:11:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Before you reply, let me explain my thoughts. Many discuss, "When does the embryo become a human being?" These people are so obsessed with the idea that this is the only thing that matters. Then when I ask them, "What do you think about hunting, or the death penalty?" they reply they're all for it, or that's different. Killing animals is "OK, because we're a higher being". If anything, I think this gives us the responsibility of morality, to recognize that taking advantage over other species with awareness of their position is inherently wrong. The death penalty is simply the same thing as aborting a late-week fetus, except that the fully developed human actually has dreams, hopes, fears, loves, aspirations, feelings, and a capacity of knowledge.

My view is that morality should be questions based on whether or not someone or something is suffering. That is, after all, what it boils down to, is it not? So, the question is, to me, when does the embryo actually able to *suffer*?

2007-09-27 03:08:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 03:04:00 · 6 answers · asked by Fia 5

aside from having a golden heart of course.

2007-09-27 02:53:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 02:28:40 · 13 answers · asked by rose 1

losing that which is important in order to find oneself or getting all what the world could offer..?

2007-09-27 02:26:37 · 10 answers · asked by maconsolviaa 5

2007-09-27 02:23:57 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 02:05:37 · 4 answers · asked by x 2

Thanks philosophers to all your questions. Have a wonderful day!

2007-09-27 02:04:33 · 10 answers · asked by Third P 6

I will show you the way.

There is light at the end of the tunnel and I will show you how to see it.

There is love at the end of the rainbow and I will show you how to feel it.

There is beautfiul music at the end of a day and I will show you how to hear it.

There is soft essences all around us and I will show you how to smell them.

Come, and let your troubles fade away.

2007-09-27 01:53:52 · 19 answers · asked by abluebobcat 4

2007-09-27 01:20:49 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 01:16:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

1. Since wholes include you, you would be thought as part.
2. Since parts compose you, you would be thought as whole.
3. Since differences distinguish you, you would be thought as equivalence.
4. Since equivalences equate you, you would be thought as uniqueness.
5. Since limits limit you, you would be thought as link.
6. Since links link you, you would be thought as limit.
7. Since influences influence you, you would be thought as sensation.
8. Since sensations sense you, you would be thought as influence.
9. Since derivatives inherit you, you would be thought as origin.
10. Since origins originate you, you would be thought as derivative.
11. Since conditions condition you, you would be thought as rule.
12. Since rules rule you, you would be thought as condition.
13. Since fulfillments fulfill you, you would be thought as intent.
14. Since intents intend you, you would be thought as fulfillment.

Could you disprove these statements as false?

2007-09-27 00:18:45 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

This is a philosophical question! Thanks to all your answers. Have a great day!

2007-09-27 00:18:13 · 11 answers · asked by Third P 6

2007-09-26 23:44:24 · 11 answers · asked by Clarence Alvin L 1

This is a philosophical question! Philosophers, thanks to all your answers. Have a wonderful day!

2007-09-26 23:38:01 · 17 answers · asked by Third P 6

2007-09-26 23:25:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-26 22:08:43 · 15 answers · asked by jiya 1

2007-09-26 22:07:13 · 15 answers · asked by Aquamarine 5