2007-09-26 23:25:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Definitely eggs. I had omelet for breakfast and chicken curry during lunch.
2007-09-27 00:13:36 · answer #1 · answered by yogeshwargarg 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The chicken cannot come first because it came out of an egg! And the egg can't come first because it came out of the chicken! Get it?
2007-09-27 00:34:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anastasia W 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer to this question, in my opinion is the egg. Because where did the chicken come from nowhere?
2007-09-26 23:36:48 · answer #3 · answered by panhead999 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think in prehistoric times etc, there was 2 creatures, who both had chicken genes in them who mated and produced an egg - this hatched into the first chicken.
therefore, the egg came first.
2007-09-26 23:38:24 · answer #4 · answered by -♥-Awake and Unafraid-♥- 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The chicken came first. Can a baby survive on its own without a parent to take care of it or teach it how to take care of itself long enough to produce another so they would continue to exist??
2007-09-27 01:57:53 · answer #5 · answered by Kbrand5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The chicken...the egg is a product of reproduction, thus something must produce it.
2007-09-27 04:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by gryphon1911 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"... the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg."
2007-09-26 23:35:53 · answer #7 · answered by Ferris 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are right. No chicken, no egg.
2007-09-26 23:56:30 · answer #8 · answered by zeal4him 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Egg.
2007-09-26 23:44:33 · answer #9 · answered by gulfbreeze8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who came before the adults or babies ? i think the its the chicken came firstly , its logically the manufacture came before the product its a natural law
2007-09-27 00:12:28 · answer #10 · answered by left5281 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋