Philosophy - August 2007

by Correspondence or by Coherence?

2007-08-17 00:42:23 · 7 answers · asked by the lioness 4

Why?

2007-08-17 00:32:48 · 14 answers · asked by zen 7

2007-08-17 00:09:09 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-17 00:00:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

five years from now?

where would I go, who will I see in
five years from now?
tell me how will I live in
five years from now?
would I be locked down or be under ground
five years from now?
would I have me a wife or some kids
five years from now?
tell me what my future holds it scares me not to know
five years from now.

2007-08-16 23:37:20 · 4 answers · asked by tripppah 3

Than deluding ourselves...by thinking that we are aware and intelligent?

2007-08-16 23:35:13 · 9 answers · asked by LUCKY3 6

What is it all about? Very curious!

2007-08-16 22:24:01 · 1 answers · asked by an_agentsmith 1

Thank you for your answer! :)

Have a wonderful day/night! :)

2007-08-16 22:21:35 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

Max Planck, the Father of Quantum Physics once quoted "We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they exist up until now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future."

2007-08-16 22:21:13 · 8 answers · asked by Aken 3

2007-08-16 22:18:47 · 19 answers · asked by adnama 1

4 example: in the movie "the day after tommorrow" 4 men were tied together hauling a sled while traveling thru a deadly snowstorm. as they walked over a glass ceiling it broke and they all dangled over a deep drop that would kill them. the man at the bottom cut his line so himself and the sled would fall and the other 3 could live. isn't that suicide/self sacrifice? now why would this man be condemned 4 this?

2007-08-16 21:47:14 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-16 21:35:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

why do people refer to the heart when talking about love other than than the fact of how much someone can mean to us how they can mean our life and how our heart is such a vital organ. or is that the only reason love is connected with the heart?

2007-08-16 20:43:41 · 10 answers · asked by Nevermind 3

This doubt is dwelling in my mind for so many years.When we buy some thing we seems to be happy,wen we pass in an exam,wen we buy a car ,getting a job,having sex these all give happy to all of us.But i think this is not permanent happiness.Then what is permanent happiness without having anything how can we will be happy.By losing our loved ones,death of our closed ones how can get away from all of this.What are the ways to be happy .Thanks for every answer.

2007-08-16 20:20:41 · 13 answers · asked by $ Diablo $ 1

what would you leave or do as a proof that you existed?

Vanish = just simply cease to exist physically in this world.

2007-08-16 20:06:13 · 15 answers · asked by Aken 3

Even though i am not particlarly religious, I would choose Jesus. The wisdom you could learn from him in 24 hrs. would take you a lifetime to learn.

2007-08-16 20:00:47 · 17 answers · asked by fatstan@sbcglobal.net 2

How is this quote do you like it.I think it is correct for so many people.

2007-08-16 19:40:37 · 13 answers · asked by Believe in yourself 5

Explain.

2007-08-16 19:29:57 · 7 answers · asked by fslcaptain737 4

What is the reason for your happiness.There should be reason for our happiness.Thanks for every answer.

2007-08-16 19:24:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

What if everything that you though was real, wasn’t?

What if your whole life is just one big setup?

Would you want to know the truth?

Could you handle the truth?

Or would you rather not risk knowing the truth and go on living your life?

When this question comes close to being resolved, I will post the odds that we are in a matrix along with the source of my info. So if you would prefer not to know the odds, post your response and don’t come back to this question.

2007-08-16 19:15:47 · 15 answers · asked by Magno 2

just wondering cause u no how i do but yeah

2007-08-16 18:35:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I learned, and still believe, that cause and effect were inextricably linked. That every effect (result) had a cause, but I have recently been exposed to some ideas that some effects can not and do not have causes. (the universe and consciousness for example) I realize that some things are and we just don't know any cause yet but it seems to me illogical to espouse seriously that maybe some things do not have causes rather than saying honestly, "I don't know."

2007-08-16 18:14:10 · 18 answers · asked by Mad Mac 7

2007-08-16 18:03:59 · 9 answers · asked by peace seeker 4

2007-08-16 18:02:41 · 13 answers · asked by YahooAnswers 5

1. Nothing is one if one cannot be as part.
2. Noting is one if one is not as part.
3. Nothing will be one if one cannot be as part.
4. Nothing will be one if one could not be as part.
Which one among these statement is grammatically correct?
Is there any other way to say it?

2007-08-16 18:02:18 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-08-16 17:59:58 · 6 answers · asked by jadu 1

2007-08-16 17:54:13 · 17 answers · asked by peace seeker 4

2007-08-16 17:51:12 · 3 answers · asked by Soul Flower 2

I have always felt called to the R.C. Preisthood I entered after highschool and left ogf my own freewill. Later after living my life I thought that I should go back. I met with the Jesuit community and was told I wasn't educated/ successful enough. I went to Catholic elementry, high, and post secondary educational institutions.
I still feel called to help and serve people in the name of all those who taught me and my God. Should I try again?

2007-08-16 17:51:10 · 7 answers · asked by Patrick R 2

2007-08-16 17:33:27 · 7 answers · asked by Lost. at. Sea. 7