English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Nothing is one if one cannot be as part.
2. Noting is one if one is not as part.
3. Nothing will be one if one cannot be as part.
4. Nothing will be one if one could not be as part.
Which one among these statement is grammatically correct?
Is there any other way to say it?

2007-08-16 18:02:18 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

4 answers

1. (Negation for everything somewhere) is (a number) if (a number) (proposition for the impossibility for a non-beings existence) as (something).

2. (Negation for everything somewhere) is (a number) if (a number) is not as (something).

3. (Negation for everything somewhere shall become a number) if (a number as a proposition for the impossibility for a non-beings existence) as (something).

4. (Negation for everything somewhere shall become a number) if (a number as a proposition for the impossibility for a non-beings becoming) as (something).

They are grammatically correct for incoherent thinking; none of the subjects exists as sensible phenomena; They are pointers to other descriptions as subject, but none of the descriptions point to sense descriptions and that is incoherency.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherentism

2007-08-17 13:28:42 · answer #1 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

i think number 2 is grammatically correct and you could say...if one is not as part then one is nothing♥

2007-08-21 00:03:28 · answer #2 · answered by naenae 3 · 0 0

Be as part of what? I can't tell if your statements are grammatically correct or not because they are lacking any defining context.

2007-08-17 01:32:21 · answer #3 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0 0

You lost me at number 1.

2007-08-17 03:00:39 · answer #4 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers