Ok, my first question garnered some confusion, so let me clarify. Athletes and salaries, I'm throwing out the idea of pay for performance salaries. You all seem to counter argue that everybody would swing for the fences if they were paid on stats. Again, try to think outside the box.
Each player starts with a base salary of $250,000 (higher than 90% of the American population to begin with anyway -- and we can live off it, so can they).
First would be team bonuses (in order to prevent people from giving up at bats and sacrificing themselves) Win your division each player receives a $100,000 bonus, and etc...
Second would be individual bonuses, not just HR and RBI, but overall performance. You look at sac bunts and sac flies, avg with RISP. You are concerned that with this type of pay structure, all athletes would swing for the fences, but this would also increase their strikeout rate, making them less valuable, it would also decrease the teams wins by being selfish.
2007-10-10
03:52:25
·
7 answers
·
asked by
r u serious?
3
in
Baseball