Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has recently been studying Coke cans and has discovered that they conclusively disprove evolution. Coke cans are aluminum cans that contain coca-cola. They were quite obviously designed by humans.
According to the Em Adjineri theory, since a coke can was designed by humans, all other things must have been designed too. For example, the Earth is just like a coke can in that both contain aluminum. Therefore, the Earth must have been designed too.
Em Adjineri (and I) ignore that this is an unfair generalization and a complete misuse of the inductive hypothesis. The reason we ignore those points is because they disprove creationism and a good creationist ignores anything that disproves creationism.
Take that, evolutionologists! Since coke cans were designed, everything must have been designed!
It's bullet-proof logic! (As long as nobody shoots bullets at it.)
2007-10-10 03:51:16 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
ah, but you forget, that coke cans have evolved without the involvement of man.
coke evolved from bieng a "coke" filled drink to a plain one.
coke evolved to spawn new coke, an evolutionary strain that died out and became extinct.
coke evolved to exist in green glass bottles (actually there are two forms of this, it is believed that the glass bottle coke was the common ancetor of all cokes, so while man might have genetically manipulated the species to spawn cans, it did not originally appear in cans. there was cokus cannus and cokus bottleus delecti.
then coke evolved to take on dietetic properties, this evolutionary change seemed to have taken place in both the can and the bottle version.
fanta evolved from coke due to changes in coke's environment.
pepsi a whole nother species (allegedly) evolved from coke as well.
also caffine free coke and coke zero and cherry coke are species that evolved from the original coke.
so you see it wasn't man that created the can, we might have genetically manipulated coke, but it definately predates man.
as doccumentry evidence of polar bears drinking coke during the ice age clearly demonstrates.
2007-10-10 03:55:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm not a biologist. I'm even less of an expert on the Cambrian Explosion. For a truly thorough response, if this is what you're truly looking for, try the biology section. This being said: 1) Creationists who try to use the Cambrian Explosion in their argument usually grossly exaggerate what "suddenly" means in this context. The sudden appearance of diversified forms, in this context, still means over several million years. 2) As far as my understanding goes - and as mentioned above, I'm not an expert nor do I claim to be - the Cambrian Explosion is the result of the appearance of complex, multi-cell organisms. This is the equivalent of a technological breakthrough that suddenly allows a whole bunch of new technologies to come along. It doesn't pose a serious problem to evolution.
2016-04-08 00:52:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is late and may head hurts. I'm going to take a stab a say the dude who invented the coke can was god.
By that rational..... Both the theist and atheist have been wrong.... and god has existed in the form of the coke can inventor, All other cans have just pretending..... and there is only one true god. The inventor of the coke can.
Time to kick my own ar$e and start worshipping.
Now where is that nearest 7eleven?
2007-10-10 04:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
LOL. Well I am convinced.
I always believed that the Creator was not benevolent now I know. I gave up Coke on a bet 10 years ago and now I have learned that I am living on a big Coke can.
PS: Can we drink to this?
2007-10-10 04:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I also find it unfair that the Coke can was created just so that it can be used by humans (who made it) and then just thrown away or burned in a fiery furnace.
The Coke can will refuse to believe in you when you next time use it.
2007-10-10 04:03:11 · answer #5 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
"For example, the Earth is just like a coke can in that both contain aluminum."
Can't argue with that!
2007-10-10 04:00:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Damn you creationist! Your infallible logic has once again trumped me, the Satanist humanist evolutionist. You have YET AGAIN uncovered our secret plot to turn God fearing Americans into little deluded dupes of the scientific community, guaranteeing that everyone will go to HELL! And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky creationists and your dog...errr...God, sorry.
2007-10-10 03:58:42 · answer #7 · answered by average person Violated 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Coke cans prove that Em AMjineri is a dumb person
2007-10-10 03:55:50 · answer #8 · answered by sahara_springs 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I tend to think induction is a rather weak form of logic anyway....this is gained me a great deal of scorn in the academic community.
2007-10-10 03:55:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
The problem is, who created God?
Or was the coke can always there?
2007-10-10 03:59:17 · answer #10 · answered by Honest Opinion 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋