I asked something similar not long ago but realized its shortcomings. To define 'God' is necessary in discussions about these beliefs. So now I'm going to more effectively get at what's bothering me.
An atheist rejects the possibility of God, but not necessarily the supernatural. Still, many atheists reject the possibility of the supernatural as well. Why is this, logically? A lack of evidence does not mean anything, especially considering the fact that the nature of the supernatural is to transcend the physical world that we perceive. You (we) use this same argument against theists, though we also criticize their individual ideas of the supernatural and of God. I understand the logical problems of Christianity, but that is not what I'm questioning right now. Just: for those of you who do reject the possibility of the supernatural, what is your logical reason for this?
2007-06-08
15:11:02
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Skye
5
in
Religion & Spirituality