It is a rule in the logic of evidence that the more unusual, the more important, is the fact sought to be established, the greater in amount, the more precise and conclusive in character, must be the evidence required to establish it. An unusual fact, a fact of vast significance, a fact involving life, reputation, can be established only by a great amount of evidence - evidence that will bear scrutiny and analysis.
That will be the case of the Resurrection of Jesus.
The thing affirmed as a fact is unnatural and unreasonable, according to every canon of human experience, impossible.
If it were really true that Christ rose from the dead, the world would know the exact date on which the resurrection took place. The date of a fact of such momentous importance could never be forgotten by the mind of man. But the Christian church has never known the date of Christ's resurrection.
Moreover, we find the NT writers who deal with it contradicting one another.
So, its CRUCI-FICTION right ?
2007-04-26
03:54:38
·
9 answers
·
asked by
The Skeptic
4
in
Religion & Spirituality