Regarding Matthew Mark Luke and John not present at the crucifiction? First things First.?

Question

It is a rule in the logic of evidence that the more unusual, the more important, is the fact sought to be established, the greater in amount, the more precise and conclusive in character, must be the evidence required to establish it. An unusual fact, a fact of vast significance, a fact involving life, reputation, can be established only by a great amount of evidence - evidence that will bear scrutiny and analysis.
That will be the case of the Resurrection of Jesus.
The thing affirmed as a fact is unnatural and unreasonable, according to every canon of human experience, impossible.
If it were really true that Christ rose from the dead, the world would know the exact date on which the resurrection took place. The date of a fact of such momentous importance could never be forgotten by the mind of man. But the Christian church has never known the date of Christ's resurrection.
Moreover, we find the NT writers who deal with it contradicting one another.
So, its CRUCI-FICTION right ?

Answer 1

Very good points. All summed up in one question with a catchy one-liner at the end:

A- my friend good job!!!!

Cruci-fiction..Ha I like that

Answer 2

The Apostle John was present at the crucifixion, a known fact if you had read your Bible.

John was also among the first (along with Peter, Mary Magdalene, another Mary, and Joanna) who were at the empty tomb early in the morning on the Sunday after Passover. April 13, 32 CE

The date is known. The facts are recorded.

Answer 3

The guys who wrote the Four Gospels may or may not have been present at the crucifixion. Those Gospels are actually anonymous and the church has traditionally attached those names to them. The crucifixion did happen, but the resurrection was not physical or literal, it was only a vision seen by the disciples.

Answer 4

i love all 4! Such staggering, Biblically solid, and impressive names. so as of selection: a million. Luke (that is my popular boys' call) 2. John 3. Matthew 4. Mark (it really is a brilliant call, I merely favor the others slightly extra)

Answer 5

Why should God meet your criteria as to what is and what is not important?
Why should God prove Himself to you, or to anyone else?
Evidently, you have heard the message of the Gospel, you have looked into it, you have decided that you don't believe it. That's striclty your business, isn't it?
If I choose to believe in it, that is also strictly MY business.
Isn't it?
Since you've already been told, it would seem rather a waste of time to tell you again, so we can count you as one who has heard the Good News and rejected it, and we can move on to someone else we can maybe help.
Have a nice day!

Answer 6

It is indeed CRUCI-FICTION. There is no crucifixion at all. That why they are not present.

The point is so simple. How could you crucify the one and the only son of God. What kind of God to let His only son be killed by His own creation. Illogical. And to make it worst, people worship Him....

Answer 7

Educator Fact according to man and truth of God can be entirely different things. historical fact can be based on an historian's intrerpretation. God is above man's wisdom and his truth is much greater. Those who seek the truth God's truth are given agift and this gift is called faith and through faith comes revelation and through revealtion and true personal relationship with the living God. It is not by our wisdom we know God but by his revelation.

Answer 8

They couldn't agree on how long he stuck around town as a zombie before he flew away, either.

Answer 9

If you really believe in your heart that it is fiction-then for you it is fiction. But, if you are wrong about God, you are also wrong about hell.