first one needs to resolve that the book is feasibly factual in suspected origin, given there is no source of evidence, this is a matter of faith.
then i notice that some decide which version they choose to follow.
apparently king james is popuar, is this because it sounds like the best deal, and easiest to stick to.
finally, evidently all who believe have a differing interpretation of the contents, whether its guessing, assimilating to ones lifestyle, word of mouth or what seems fair.
concidering all these variables, with no referece of definition, how can this be construed as a factual document, worthy of the life long dedication of so many
2007-04-19
01:36:49
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality