Based on the answers to my questions:
1) Competent scientists don't mind working with a sample as small as 1/1,000,000,000,000 of the total population
2) Scientists see change and assume "evolution" without testing "devolution"
3) Scientists resort to emotional responses rather than providing data
4) When questioned on details, answers take the form of assumptions colored by the thoery. Scientists are unwilling to test their own work or allow others to do so.
5) Finally, when asked if evolution in bacteria provides assumptions that can be used in evolution in humans, most answers just said yes.
(Sorry guys, this last one was a trap, and you sprung it, big time! Bacteria can evolove into a different species in only a few generations. Humans have never been observed evolving. Bad scientists! Bad conclusion! I call it "blind faith!")
2007-03-11
07:19:41
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality