Why does Bush continue to confuse the public that the war in Iraq is indicative of a purported strategy against terrorism in which, as he said in his state of the union address, "one question has surely been settled — that to win the war on terror we must take the fight to the enemy." Why is he still trying to say that Iraq was some kind of a terrorist state?
Further issues he still confounds for everyone: "From the start, America and our allies have protected our people by staying on the offense." The war in Iraq cannot "protect" the U.S. from another terrorist attack, and it never will. Osama was never caught, so how are we protected by bombing Iraq and Afghanistan or anywhere else in the Middle East?
2007-01-24
03:26:16
·
23 answers
·
asked by
What I Say
3
in
Politics