English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Baseball - December 2007

[Selected]: All categories Sports Baseball

Like page __-__. I dont need the source I know where to find it

2007-12-13 06:39:35 · 8 answers · asked by Doc Yankee30™ 5

Okay, I've seen at least three people mention Albert Pujols being on the Mitchell Report. Would you care to tell me on what page I can find his name? Or how about Brady Anderson? I've searched the document, and see neither those nor many others mentioned.

Are you all just too stupid and/or ignorant to read the report? Why the rush to slander those not included?

2007-12-13 06:39:21 · 15 answers · asked by Craig S 7

Has anyone seen any actual NAMES of players who used steroids, HGH, or anything else? I'm looking @ the copy available on MLB.com & I have only found hints as to who the players are. I listened to the radio this morning & when the topic of conversation turned to the Mitchell report, I heard that we would actually learn the identities of these players, yet no names have been mentioned.

If you find any names, please tell me where to look, cuz I don't want to have to go through all 409 pages if I'm not gonna find what I'm looking for.

2007-12-13 06:39:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now that he has been accused in the recent report on steroids. * next to his record?

2007-12-13 06:37:51 · 22 answers · asked by wooper 5

What do you think the biggest name will be? We already know about Clemens!! Do you think Ortiz? Ramirez? Guerrero? Delgado? Kenny Rogers? Frank Thomas?Ryan Howard? Give me some names

2007-12-13 06:28:41 · 12 answers · asked by Ryan 2

Did you expect to see some of the names mentioned in the Mitchell report? Were there some names you are surprised NOT to see in the report?

2007-12-13 06:22:50 · 10 answers · asked by TK421 3

i need a full list of those accused in the just realeasd mitchell report from mlb baseball

2007-12-13 06:22:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-13 06:22:25 · 3 answers · asked by pauk M 1

report, which came out today, has linked Roger Clemens and his 354 wins to steroid use. If Bonds doesn't make the Hall of Fame, neither should Clemens, you agree?

Also, Clemens career will finally be finished. No more half season contracts, he's done.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=dw-clemenssteroidsearly121307&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

2007-12-13 06:17:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are you telling me the MLB teams and players and the Commish couldn't come up with some kind of offer for this guy to SHUT HIM UP? Like 100 million dollars and sign a contract to make sure this wasn't released.

2007-12-13 06:08:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

are you surprized that the listed players are linked too steroids?
-Mike Cameron
-Johnny Damon
-Eric Gagne
-Nomar Garciaparra
-Trot Nixon
-Andy Pettitte
-Mark Prior
-Neifi Perez
-Rafael Palmiero
-Albert Pujols
-Brian Roberts
-Pudge Rodriguez
-Sammy Sosa
-Miguel Tejada
-Julian Tavarez
-Jason Varitek
-Kerry Wood
-Roger Clemens
And im suprized that Manny R. Or David Ortiz Arnt there

If you don't believe me look here => http://thesteroidera.blogspot.com/

2007-12-13 06:00:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Seriously.

2007-12-13 06:00:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

McGuire, Sosa, Bonds, Clemens, Pettit, etc. etc. etc. Either we can let this destroy our image of heroes of the game, or choose another path. I say let the past be the past, and go from here. I know that the records are tarnished, but people are just going to appreciate Ruth, Maris, Gehrig, Cy Young etc. that much more. I think the best thing to do is to start afresh. Let's have stringent frequent testing, but, again, let the past be the past, because I have a feeling that the players named in this report are far from a comprehensive list.

What do others think?

2007-12-13 06:00:03 · 4 answers · asked by Stephen L 6

2007-12-13 05:57:36 · 9 answers · asked by Cornell Big Red 4

2007-12-13 05:54:42 · 2 answers · asked by Joe B 1

I have a picture of Grady and Pronk high-fiving a player with the number 4 on the back of his jersey, but I can't figure out who it is.

2007-12-13 05:53:46 · 3 answers · asked by Wordsmith 3

Conflict of interest, anyone?

2007-12-13 05:46:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Shouldn't most of the anger about steroids be directed at Major League Baseball?

The owners and management had to have known if this many peopel were juiced for as long as the "Report" implies.

It sounds like they are accessories, before the fact to me, but all the attention is on the players.

How many of these players would have lost their careers if they had refused to go along with the League's pro-juicing policy?

I personally don't believe most of the critics of the players would have been willing to just walk away from the game if they thought they might be cut from their team for not juicing.

2007-12-13 05:46:13 · 8 answers · asked by Victor S 5

It says that "several" prominent Yankees will be named on the report. If they are taking away individual performances, why not teams?

2007-12-13 05:44:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I love how fans immediately believe that just because someone said something makes it true. Haven't you ever heard of people saying things to get publicity or for revenge? It happens all the time in the media with celebrities, ALL THE TIME! I mean, right now they are going on and on about the trainer. Don't you think that trainer wanted to be mentioned? Now people know his name and he can make money selling his story like Canseco. Please people, use common sense before jumping to conclusion.

2007-12-13 05:36:18 · 4 answers · asked by Thomas C 4

Isn't it curious that during the playoffs an Indian pitcher's name was "leaked" and that the first two names are yankee pitchers?

1) Do you believe that the investigation was biased?
2) Do you think that any red sox player will be named?

2007-12-13 05:31:52 · 8 answers · asked by Emilio Z 2

2007-12-13 05:16:13 · 7 answers · asked by ladysosureone 6

For years, there has been speculation that Clemens might have been juicing, which led to his longevity and ability to pitch until he was 45, but I never suspected Pettitte was involved in it. However, it all makes sense now, because Pettitte and Clemens have long been work-out buddies, so it makes sense that they would both be on the same work-out regimen, diet, and steroid/supplement plan. This will spell the end of Clemens career for sure. Do you think that this might negatively effect his chances for the Hall of Fame?

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=ApsrsUqF2Wfrg2nqd482xuQ5nYcB?slug=ap-mitchellreport&prov=ap&type=lgns

2007-12-13 05:15:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

how does he dig up the evidence on which mlb people took steriods?

2007-12-13 05:14:11 · 5 answers · asked by Kevin H 1

IS it going to be free to download via espn or be posted anywhere for me to print out and read it on the john/at work?

2007-12-13 05:10:08 · 6 answers · asked by Derek B 1

2007-12-13 05:05:15 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

don't they have something better to do? I think MLB should handle it, not our government.

2007-12-13 05:05:03 · 7 answers · asked by ♪ ♫ ☮ NYbron ☮ ♪ ♫ 6

2007-12-13 05:04:33 · 3 answers · asked by doublewidemama 6

why is the title of dan wetzels column "Clemens fingered", sounds kinda dirty!

i just though he took steroids, i didnt need to know all that.

2007-12-13 05:04:30 · 4 answers · asked by George C 4

is this really what the government should be focused on right now?? and the guys connected to the red sox. conflict of interest??

2007-12-13 05:04:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers