You must be anticipating a name on the list that you don't want to see.
2007-12-13 05:12:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
No, he is not a "punk". He is an outside party commissioned by Major League Baseball to uncover the culture of drug use in the sport.
If Jason Varitek was listed, would you then dismiss the conflict of interest assumption?
2007-12-13 05:59:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by SMH Corp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Selig is the bigger punk. This guy turned his head the other way for several years and now he wants to show that he's against steroid use and let's not forget that Selig is connected to the Milwaukee Brewers.
2007-12-13 05:24:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by rdrssuk 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm tired of hearing about "the Mitchell Report"...who cares about "the Mitchell Report"........so lame. The media are such tools. They love this s^@t. hahaha Baseball sucks because of "the Mitchell Report" not because of steroids.
2007-12-14 17:45:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by jebussssssssssss 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr. Mitchell was appointed by Congress so Congress COULD focus on other things, boy; he is a RETIRED senator.
Punk? No; but he did expose a lot of OTHER punks, didn't he?
Further proof that BASEBALL SUCKS AND IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME, JUST LIKE THE NFL, NBA, NHL, AND PRO WRESTLING!!!
It's time we all got a life and told pro athletes to do the same.
2007-12-13 05:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lonnie P 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
He wasn't doing this as part of Congress, and actually isn't a member of Congress(FORMER CONGRESSMAN means he isn't in Congress). He was brought in by Bud Selig to do this.
2007-12-13 05:27:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
truth is thruth but we r not electing them to do to this sort of thing they have there on commissioners~~~~~
2007-12-13 05:19:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by ladysosureone 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you afraid of the truth?
2007-12-13 05:11:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
from your NAME i assume this is because of clemons,sorry but the truth is what it is,and rodger AINT WHAT WE THOUGHT HE WAS.
2007-12-13 05:12:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋