Isn't it curious that during the playoffs an Indian pitcher's name was "leaked" and that the first two names are yankee pitchers?
1) Do you believe that the investigation was biased?
2) Do you think that any red sox player will be named?
2007-12-13 05:31:52 · 8 answers · asked by Emilio Z 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
I guess that he is lying about not being impartial and not targeting any of the Red Sox. What about Manny Ramirez or that "Big" dude..... I'm sure there are other "broken down" players on that team that were tempted to use steroids to lessen the recovery time on injuries.....
If it was sanctioned by MLB, I'll believe that report, but coming from an independent source is kind of fishy, just like the Barry Bonds trial.
2007-12-13 10:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe the investigation was biased and if a Red Sox player surfaced as part of the investigation I believe that Mitchell would include the name(s) on the list.
2007-12-13 06:20:08 · answer #2 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never mind what I said before about Varitek and such because I don't think it's true that they're on it.
The investigation is probably a little biased, but this is supposed to be strictly professional. Red Sox players were named.
2007-12-13 05:51:36 · answer #3 · answered by sum1 w/ @n @nsw3r 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If no Red Sox players are on the list that would be very suspicious. More than likely every team will have a "representative".
2007-12-13 05:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by Dirty Dave 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Red Sox don't cheat.
2007-12-13 05:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by Emily Chicago 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Varitek was named.
2007-12-13 05:34:37 · answer #6 · answered by trer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would have to be at least one if not mitchell will loose credibility.
2007-12-13 05:39:00 · answer #7 · answered by ericktravel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We'll find out...
2007-12-13 05:40:25 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋