Lots of people have suggested that Bonds, Sosa, McGwire et al. should not be elected to the Hall of Fame, despite the fact that there has been no proof of steroid use by any of them.
Sosa was caught with a corked bat, but he claimed it was an accident and the fans believed him. Bonds did test positive for amphetamines, but they were only banned this past year, so it's probable that some current HOFers used them.
Gaylord Perry, on the other hand, was an admitted doctorer of baseballs. He was suspended once for it, but has since admitted that he did it a lot more. Despite that, he was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1991.
Is this a double standard? Or is there a difference in the situations? Should Perry be in the Hall?
2007-01-17
12:44:12
·
13 answers
·
asked by
jdbreeze1
4
in
Baseball