Although most people say that there is no evidence to support the existence of God, why do you not realize that "no evidence" does not automatically mean "doesn't exist"?
Unless you claim to have absolute knowledge of the universe, you cannot say definitely that God exists. Can you also explain the following?
1. All things must have a creator ( watches have watchmakers, animals have parents, etc...)
2. If all things have creators, that means the universe should also have a creator, seeing as something cannot spontaneously give rise to itself.
3. Therefore, an force outside of the bounds of the universe created it.
4. This must be supernatural and not bound by laws of physics in order to defy law of conservation of energy
So, how do atheists, without proper knowledge, say, "it was NOT God. It could have been anything EXCEPT God..." without commiting the logical fallacy of ad argumentum infinitum?
2007-11-15
14:36:01
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous