Under Roe and Casey, abortion is legal, that is, its legal to terminate a homo-sapien organism with a lesser celluar mass.
Established law has "precedantial" value. In other words, wise legal minds need to consider what type of "Genies" this bottle may release in the future.
Consider that mind-spinning movement of genetics. We already have the ability to analyze DNA and predict certain traits or outcomes.
Now imagine a future, where un-protected humans (embryos) can be analyzed genetically. Remember, these organisms have almost no rights, with the exception that a stranger cant kill the fetuses, that against the law (the mother can). So because the under-developed human has no rights, the argument can be made that the non-human human can be genetically engineered by the mother. After all, she can terminate the non-human human right?
2007-01-29
11:59:16
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Savior
1