Religion & Spirituality - 10 December 2006

I am writting on the topic that "why a person feel danger from other person today" (aaj insaan insaan se kyuin darta hai). so please help me in adding urs ideas and knowledge.

2006-12-10 18:42:36 · 14 answers · asked by arif k 1

Just curious, write what u want on the topic that is and i know i ask too many questions...just humour me :)

2006-12-10 18:38:34 · 19 answers · asked by cactus_chic3 2

The first king of the Messianic succession was the biblical Cain, head of the Sumerian House of Kish. On recognizing this, one can immediately see an early anomaly in the traditional Genesis story, for the historical line to David and Jesus was not from Adam and Eve's son Seth at all. It descended from Eve's son Cain.


Conventional teaching generally cites Cain as being the first son of Adam and Eve - but he was not; even the book of Genesis tells us that he was not. In fact, it confirms how Eve told Adam that Cain's father was the Lord - who was of course Enki the archetype. Even outside the Bible, the writings of the Hebrew Talmud and Midrash make it quite plain that, although Cain was Eve's eldest son, he was not the son of Adam.


The Old Testament book of Genesis (in its translated form) tells us that Cain was 'a tiller of the ground' - but this is not what the original text relates. What it states is that Cain had 'dominion over the earth', which is a rather different matter when considering his kingly status.


The Bible translators appear to have had a constant problem with the word 'earth' - often translating it to ground, clay or dust, instead of recognizing it as relating to the Earth. Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators made glaring errors. The Bible says, 'Male and female created he them, and he called their name Adam'. Older writings use the more complete word Adâma, which means 'of the Earth'. However, this did not mean they were made of dirt; it means (as the Anchor Hebrew Bible explains in precise terms) that they were Earthlings.


Around 6,000 years ago, Adam and Eve (known then as Atâbba and Kâva - and jointly called the Adâma) were purpose-bred for kingship by Enki and his sister-wife Nîn-khursag. This took place at a 'creation chamber' which the Sumerian annals refer to as the House of Shi-im-tî (meaning 'breath‹wind‹life' ).


Adam and Eve were certainly not the first people on Earth, but they were the first of the genetically contrived kingly succession. The records tell that Nîn-khursag was called the Lady of the Embryo or the Lady of Life, and she was the surrogate mother for Atâbba and Kâva, who were created from human ova fertilized by the Lord Enki.


It was because of Nîn-khursag's title, Nîn-tî (meaning Lady of Life), that Kâva was later given the same distinction by the Hebrews. Indeed, the name Kâva (Ava or Eve) was subsequently said to mean 'life'.


Both Enki and Nîn-khursag (along with their brother Enlil) belonged to a pantheon of gods and goddesses referred to as the Anunnaki which, in Sumerian, means 'Heaven came to Earth' (An-unna-ki). In fact, the Grand Assembly of the Anunnaki (later called the Court of the Elohim) is actually mentioned in the Old Testament's Psalm No. 82, wherein Jehovah makes his bid for supreme power over the other gods.


According to tradition, the importance of Cain was that he was directly produced by Enki and Kâva, so his blood was three-quarters Anunnaki, while his half-brothers, Hevel and Satânael (better known as Abel and Seth), were less than half Anunnaki, being the offspring of Atâbba and Kâva (Adam and Eve).


Cain's Anunnaki blood was so advanced that it was said that his brother Abel's blood was earthbound by comparison. It was related in the scriptures that Cain 'rose far above Abel', so that his brother's blood was swallowed into the ground - but this original description was thoroughly misinterpreted for the modern Bible, which now claims that Cain 'rose up against Abel' and spilled his blood upon the ground. This is not the same thing at all.

2006-12-10 18:37:43 · 13 answers · asked by fuck 3

2006-12-10 18:35:52 · 16 answers · asked by Sara 5

I'm a christian man, i got a girlfriend, so i'm trying not to think about sex and perverted things, but i can't seem to quit. Even when she's just in her shorts, i feel turned on. I hope i hear from someone who knows what i'm talking about...

2006-12-10 18:33:50 · 22 answers · asked by cupofjoe_84 1

In the Treaty of Tripoli, drafted in 1796 under George Washington and signed by John Adams in 1797, in Article 11, it states:

"As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

Also, the original Pledge of Allegiance didn't contain the words "under God". The congress voted to include that in 1954 during the McCarthy era.

To declare the US was founded as a Christian nation shows ignorance and no research done on behalf in finding out the truth and not relying on what you've been told!

2006-12-10 18:33:02 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

...what Shavuot is?
Also, why is a ram's horn blown on Rosh Hashana?

thank you!

2006-12-10 18:32:35 · 3 answers · asked by -♦One-♦-Love♦- 7

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061210/india_nm/india279771

2006-12-10 18:30:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

a) You believe that the Bible is flawless; it is the word of God and contains no errors. Every event in the Bible happens as they are described. The Earth is only 6,000 years old. Those who do not believe that Jesus was the son of God will go to Hell.

b) You believe that the Bible does contain the word of God in it, but also has been influenced by man and many different generations. You believe that many things can not be taken directly as they are stated in the Bible, as they are metaphorical. You may or may not believe that all non-Christians will be sent to Hell.

c) You believe that Jesus is the son of God, and that many of his teachings were as the Bible states, but it can not be used as a guide to Christianity or be expected to represent Jesus or God. Trying to get closer to Jesus and living a pure life, striving to better yourself is all that is required of us in this life. Choosing another religion besides Christianity will not recieve eternal punishment in Hell.

2006-12-10 18:27:23 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

(I have been checking this out every day when I come onto yahoo, and the list is always pretty much the same):
1)Britney Spears
2)Paris Hilton
3)Beyonce Knowles
4)America's Next Top Model
5)Lindsay Lohan
6)Jessica Simpson
7)Katharine Mcphee
8)WWE

This list is truly sad, what does it say about people?

2006-12-10 18:21:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Dont they know its illegal?

Exposing minors to porn is as bas as posession of child porn.

I request IP adresses from Yahoo of all of these offenders be forwarded to police. I encourage you all to ask Yahoo to do this as well. Mocking holy things is enough. Insulting each other is more than enough. I have seen more ignorance and grammer errors here than I should have ever been exposed to.

But I for one, would like to draw the line at sex crimes with minors.

Anyone agree? Anyone in?


Blessings
David

2006-12-10 18:20:17 · 26 answers · asked by David T 3

They always show up at dinner time or some other inconvenient moment ( Like when I'm taking a crap). Does their religion require them to do this??

2006-12-10 18:17:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-10 18:17:19 · 6 answers · asked by SmashJ 2

From everything I have read and studied, it appears to me that the Muslim religion is not very peaceful after all. Bottom line is that, if you don't convert...you must die. Someone tell me if this is accurate.

2006-12-10 18:17:07 · 14 answers · asked by cabotguardgirl 2

Could it be that we are the largest voting block in the Republican party, and that scares them, so they have to trot out their left-wing wackos, and attempt to quell us into submission? Well, it will not work.

2006-12-10 18:16:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am at times a door knob. I try to force G-d's hand. I insult people and try to teach with love and conviction like Pharisees instead of truth and love like Yeshua Jesus.

I have been convicted by G-d's Holy Spirit and I repent. I am sincerely sorry for my questions earlier, they are removed. I have done this twice now, when will I learn?

I did not behave like a true Christian but like a sinful human. It promises this in Romans, but I hate fulfilling it so often. I apologize to anyone affoended and most of All to G-d for such weak use of His gifts.

I apologize because its the Christian thing to do, admit a wrong. This is my best example of Christianity tonight. Sorry.
And I thank Him for convictimg my heart! I rejoice in that.

Sincerely
David the door knob.

2006-12-10 18:14:34 · 14 answers · asked by David T 3

Who's big idea was it to settle a country with people who wore belt buckles on their hats?

2006-12-10 18:11:30 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Personally I'm not an atheist, I'm more the kind of person who believes there's something out there, but not neccesarily the big G. In highschool I regularly partook in debates in some of the christian clubs and we had a good time exploring eachothers' differences.
I'm from denmark, though, so I guess I also in part wonder why americans have to polarize everything to such extremes sometimes.

2006-12-10 18:11:07 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous 2

from what i can see from the questions i posted you all agree with me that we are now apart of Gods family. but some of you feel it is impossible to observe all the parts of the Old Testament that Jesus instructed us to observe. including the Sabbath and the Holy Days. God and His Son should rank highest on our obedience chart. I dont understand how obeying all the commands Jesus laid out for us is so hard. I never said it would be easy. but Isnt God worth the Sacrifice?

2006-12-10 18:09:37 · 22 answers · asked by Thumbs down me now 6

2006-12-10 18:09:36 · 22 answers · asked by Chase 4

I was reading the responses to my question, "Why did God kill all of Egypt's firstborn children in Exodus?", and I saw basically these reasons:

(1) Pharaoh wouldn't give into extortion, so it's really his fault. Sort of a "your head impacted my baseball bat" argument.

(2) The Egyptians did it first, which apparently makes mass slaughter of children morally correct.

(3) God WARNED the Egyptians, so, it's fair game. Did He let the 1 month olds know why they had to die at the hand of an "angel of death"?

(4) Who can question God's motives?

So, given this summary of Biblical morality, can you seriously say that the Bible is a credible source for human morality? When is killing children ever justified? Did God ABORT the would-be firstborn children?

Or perhaps, if we write off this story as weird and ancient mythology, just like the rest of the Bible, we can make moral progress.

So, I ask you, can you credibly say the Bible is the source of any decent system of morality?

2006-12-10 18:09:22 · 10 answers · asked by STFU Dude 6

2006-12-10 18:09:16 · 8 answers · asked by SN 1

2006-12-10 18:06:08 · 10 answers · asked by Justanian 1

2006-12-10 18:05:58 · 14 answers · asked by dogpatch USA 7

Just for fun, what is the name of the girl I am most in love with? Go ahead, tell me and convert me.

2006-12-10 18:03:23 · 14 answers · asked by Free Ranger 4

2006-12-10 18:00:56 · 29 answers · asked by USA USA USA 2

Disagree with them and you are persecuting them.

2006-12-10 17:57:54 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Your secret is safe with me. Bacon tastes good!!!

2006-12-10 17:55:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-10 17:53:48 · 33 answers · asked by Justanian 1

2006-12-10 17:51:26 · 36 answers · asked by Doctor Biobrain 3