And if so, can you answer me this, if the universe is only 6,000 years old as Ken Ham asserts, but very basic astronomy tells us that the furthest objects that we can see at night are 12 billion years away, is he suggesting that our factual understanding of the speed of light is erroneous, just like he claims that all 42 types of radio-isotope dating are "bogus" (his word)?
And, at $30,000,000 bucks a year, don't you think that it's possible that he just does this for the money?
2006-09-27
08:25:09
·
3 answers
·
asked by
keepitsafe2think
2