And if so, can you answer me this, if the universe is only 6,000 years old as Ken Ham asserts, but very basic astronomy tells us that the furthest objects that we can see at night are 12 billion years away, is he suggesting that our factual understanding of the speed of light is erroneous, just like he claims that all 42 types of radio-isotope dating are "bogus" (his word)?
And, at $30,000,000 bucks a year, don't you think that it's possible that he just does this for the money?
2006-09-27 08:25:09 · 3 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Those of you who don't think that Ken Ham is insane, put tinfoil on your heads so we know who you are.
Jay: He doesn't go toe-to toe with anybody. He makes lectures and sells his books at more than $25 a pop. He has never enganged in an online debate, not has he done any debate outside of his circle of admirers. As for AiG: Even a basic science class can demonstrate that these clowns are making it up as they go along.
2006-09-27 08:29:15 · answer #1 · answered by Scott M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, i like a bit of Chinese cooking.
2006-09-27 15:29:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speed of light
http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/fine_structure.asp
radio-isotope dating
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/creation-research
$30,000,000 bucks a year !!!
Are you done making this up? Stupid - stupid - stupid...
2006-09-27 15:34:15 · answer #3 · answered by Jay Z 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋