Supposing that Adam and Eve were our first of ancestors. And writers of the bible didn't know about Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Neanderthal, or Homo Ergaster. (Because technology to discover this back then did not exist) How can it be disproved that Adam and Eve did not pertain to a prehistoric human race? Keep in mind that consiousness was gathered from the tree. Did the tree make the transition between unconscious beings and create the start of conscious beings? If so then Adam and Eve would have been born of one race, and slowly begun the transformations of future of races.
What if both science and religion could come together on this subject. After all, You can't disprove Creationism if the biblical writers did not have proper understanding of the elements within evolution. In this case Evolution doesn't disprove Creationism, only creates a potential for understanding ignorance amongst biblical writers.
Any opinion on why this isn't plausible?
2007-12-28
09:33:22
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Nick
2
in
Religion & Spirituality