Let me say that we have a usual, common-sense way of telling the truth about things and that is looking at available evidence (witness statements and physical evidence).
Having said that, allow me to play the same game with the person of Abraham Lincoln. For this exercise, I deny that he ever existed, was president or freed the slave.
I state that all of your evidence is forged, falsified, purgured or mistakenly understood.
I realize that this is surely a bit extreme, but the Lincoln Hoax was, indeed, pulled off in a more technologically advanced world and as such, is more easily believed than the Christ hoax. After all there were no cameras or printing presses available, so the Christ-hoax conspiracy used more people in lieu of technology.
This hoax is old and all witnesses are dead. So their statements cannot be challenged and are therefore invalid!
I guess that sums up the total of the 'Christ-hoax' arguements
Prove that Lincoln existed and did what history records.
2007-11-04
07:43:40
·
24 answers
·
asked by
athorgarak
4
in
Religion & Spirituality