I am trying to stay respectful tonight. I got a bit annoyed last night and was a bit short in my questions. So please be respectful in turn.
I know it is said Peter was Bishop in Rome. If he was why didn't Paul mention him in his letter to Rome or in any of his letters written from Rome. Consider the following.
"In A.D. 58 Paul wrote to the Romans, but does not mention Peter. In Romans 1:11, he wants to impart special gifts, and in Romans 1:15 he is ready to preach there. He sends greetings to twenty-seven persons, but none to Peter.
"In 61 Paul is conveyed a prisoner to Rome, and certain brethren go to meet him, but not Peter.
"At Rome Paul writes to the Galatians, and mentions Peter, but not as being there or as having been pontiff there for twenty years [as the Roman Catholic Church claims].
2007-10-15
16:56:58
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Bible warrior
5
in
Religion & Spirituality