The scientific community overwhelmingly endorses evolution, which is backed by an incredible amount of evidence, and no counter examples. ID is not science because it fails to meet observations and fails to meet basic scientific criteria for a theory. Does the religious community simply think that science is unreliable?
I don't understand the skepticism, when science consistently delivers facts and religion just creates divisions and myths.
Is education that poor that people are prepared to believe myths rather than scientific facts or is it a right-side/left-side brain diference?
Science is interested in understanding nature and has a respectable process for acheiving this called the scientific method. It involves observation, theorizing, testing and peer review. How can faith be considered more reliable than this? How much faith do you put in used car salesmen? You require evidence that you aren't going to be ripped off right?
2006-12-31
03:54:53
·
31 answers
·
asked by
gbiaki
2
in
Religion & Spirituality