Simply put, it is copying some of nature's ways. Here are examples: (a) The seagull's wings was copied to make an aircraft of high maneuverability, (b) Mercedes Benz copied the low-drag design of a boxfish. THE QUESTION NOW IS THIS: If the copy requires an intelligent designer, what about the original? ( Asked by Awake! Sept 2006 issue)
Professor Behe, a noted bio-chemist, published an article re. complex molecular machine that led to the conclusion of a DESIGNER. And you know what the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AASS) did? It issued an appeal to its members to do everything in their power to FEND OFF THE IDEA THAT LIFE PROVIDES EVIDENCE OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN? Why such an appeal? I thought that Scientific experiments should not be rigged but lead to the right conclusion.
So, 2 Question: ARE WE BEING BLINDED BY SCIENTISTS--like AASS to support their bias in favor of Evolution?
2006-07-22
04:11:08
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality