Gender Studies - June 2007

First off, I don't do this to girls I don't know. I call my coworkers or friends sweetheart/honey sometimes babycakes or angelmuffin its just my way of showing them theyre close to me so when did terms of endearment become sexist? are feminists responsible for this?

2007-06-18 00:52:34 · 23 answers · asked by Rick 1

2007-06-17 18:16:30 · 5 answers · asked by martialartsman 2

I am not talking about homosexuals or lesbians, or trans-sexuals.

2007-06-17 14:36:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it my biological clock or has society programmed me to want these things?

I was never concerned with having either before last week. Now I really want both. Isn't that weird?

2007-06-17 14:28:46 · 15 answers · asked by Still*Perfect 4

I am interested in analysing female sensuality (after reading Nancy Friday's books). I am most intersetsed to know if professional women (e.g. doctors, nurses, lawyers, lecturers) have pleasured themselves whilst at work and how often and if they have been caught. Why professional women? They are a turn-on. A female friend of mine who was a criminal lawyer said that she had masturbated at her office in the toilets over a rape case she was dealing with. She had also been caught going solo by her male friend's wife whilst she was a guest at their place. Also a teacher said that she had pleasured herself in the common room when she was alone. A businesswoman friend said that she went solo in a car park. And a collegaue of mine said that she did it whilst driving and nearly crashed. I had been caught by a housemaid whilst staying in a hotel. She smiled and walked out. She later admitted that she thought of me whilst she wanked and liked my size. She regrets not having sex there and then

2007-06-17 11:18:01 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-17 09:29:56 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

RAPE by members of the U.S and UK military ? Reading some of the opinions here it would seem many believe so. Reply or are you afraid to ?

2007-06-17 08:57:02 · 16 answers · asked by Herbal2 1

because the truth is they do a lot. looks don't matter that much to women when they are ready to settle down and looking for a long term relationship. when it comes to sexual attraction, looks are the most important factor.

the truth is, when it comes to sexual attraction, women choose looks over personality, over money, over compatibility, even over sexual experience. come on, we all know most women, even in their 30s and older would much rather screw an 18 year old with no job and nothing in common with them if he's cute than an average looking, rich, successful guy around their age with a good job and personality who has a lot in common with them. so why do women act like they are different from guys and care about other things?

2007-06-17 07:16:48 · 15 answers · asked by ? 2

Would anyone ever describe their emotions in this manner in regrads to the man who was responsible for your birth?

This is a questions for ladies and gemtlemen ....others are requested to kindly take a pass if they feel they do not qualify for any of these two titles.

2007-06-17 06:59:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-17 03:59:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

woman isnt only beautiful limb.
she is spirit of god.
Nakedness of woman to negativeeffect to the cell of the man.
(if she isnt his wife)
woman can to point her frontier with completecovering.
they can to show her modesty with her cover.
woman is pearle.
always the pearl is inside of the narce.
narce is cover for pearl.
the narce is saviour for pearl.
woman has a indicative of chastity:
(maryam)
thanks

2007-06-17 01:45:06 · 7 answers · asked by Ali from iran 1

2007-06-17 01:37:21 · 7 answers · asked by Simple gurl 4

I noticed some of them even slinging insults at them like calling them racist or opressive FOR MARRYING AN ASIAN WOMAN !!! It so does not make sense. Is it just the fear of some soon to be old maids looking for a hubby or is there more to it ?

2007-06-17 00:01:19 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

of 19th and 20th century.....................itz reeely vry important!!!!

2007-06-16 20:19:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-16 17:55:15 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is my argument:
There are innate differences between males and females
Ex: Reproduction... if it were to be equal males should have to carry the baby for four and a half months, but that is not the case according to the 'laws of nature'

The laws of nature are also applied with secondary sex characteristics (males=muscles and etc. + females=curves and etc.)

Thus, the 'laws of nature' make females and males better adapted to certain things. (aka females are better at certain things than males are and vice versa)

So... if we are treating eachother equally are we effectively handicapping eachother to what we could be if we worked together and treated eachother fairly? Is there a difference between being treated fairly and being treated equally?

If two people who were hired to a certain company whose office was on the third floor of a building, would it be fair if their were only stairs and one of the people was confined to a wheelchair? They are treated equally.

2007-06-16 15:50:37 · 17 answers · asked by CoopALoop 2

2007-06-16 14:57:38 · 12 answers · asked by Girl Machine 7

A research study on aggression in men suggests it may be due to variations in one of two genes. But do the men with the “aggression” gene have to become the "bad seeds"? Not necessarily. The study found that genetics appears to be predictive only if men have more *cynical* and *hostile attitudes* towards others or have fathers who never completed high school. Here's the article about the study:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060621162228.htm

Do you think these "aggressive" genes could be dealt with if boy's attitudes we're more hopeful and positive?

I don't see the link between boys aggression level and the father's educational level, though, do you?

2007-06-16 10:48:01 · 13 answers · asked by edith clarke 7

I have nothing against women. I just hates Feminist/Feminism. Is there anything wrong with that?

The main reason why I'm so anti-Feminist/Feminism is because, they keep on protesting against stuff that I like, stuff like beauty pageant, playboy, porn etc..etc.. Plus, they are bunch man hatter. I've meet some Feminist/Feminism in real life and they annoyed the **** out of me.

Plus, it seem to me like the majority of Feminist out there are pretty unattractive looking too, yuck!. I'm going to be a US president one day and I'm going to ban Feminism.

Your thought?

2007-06-16 10:33:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've never forced any woman to sleep with me. I gather women wouldn't want the same from men. Is that right?

2007-06-16 10:11:21 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Should women who take traditional roles such as homemaker, housekeeping, child care, child rearing, wife, mother, grandmother etc get paid or some sort of guaranteed support? If this was a proposed law you could vote for, how would you vote and why? What details would make you lean another direction? Would you vote in favor of a law that guaranteed even single mothers support in being stay at home mothers?

2007-06-16 09:33:31 · 15 answers · asked by ? 4

I fear my mom way more.
She run my house with iron fist.

2007-06-16 09:25:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why can't an abstract political or philosophical question get more attention?

2007-06-16 09:14:45 · 6 answers · asked by ? 4

I've been wondering why the US right-wing is not only fighting abortion, but fighting birth control availability as well (individual pharmacists can refuse to fill birth control prescriptions in many US states, among other limits on contraceptives). The article below points out what right-wingers believe: "Christians must recognize that this rebellion against parenthood represents nothing less than an absolute revolt against God's design." and "The church should insist that the biblical formula calls for adulthood to mean marriage and marriage to mean children."

So is the right wing agenda not just about fighting for control of women's bodies and abortion, but it's really about fighting for control of birth control and it's true goal is fighting for control of marriage, so the right-wing can force men and women to have children, since they think that "marriage means children"?

Or are there other reasons right-wingers don't want US women to have access to contraceptives?

2007-06-16 08:32:21 · 14 answers · asked by edith clarke 7

2007-06-16 08:16:07 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would you like it? If it happens, what would you do?

2007-06-16 07:56:10 · 12 answers · asked by Sonia 2

2007-06-16 06:05:08 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

are people not getting the point to this section.

2007-06-16 03:00:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

We all had those moments dont we ? so just tell it of here and just think of it of asking nature for your wishes to come true.

2007-06-16 00:46:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-15 20:58:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous