(my having just seen a History Channel production regarding the
9 11 debacle).
It was a long question, starting with "why was bldg #7 brought down late afternoon, 9/11 when it suffered almost no damage from
#1 and #2 buildings' collapse". And, then was imploded from the bottom floor UP, if true, very unorthadox method. Neverthess, the charges HAD to be already in place for this to occur the same day.
Then I revealed a theory by some, that similar charges had been in place in the Towers that fell. And I theorized then, an example of why I felt this was true:
#1, is the tower had large antenna on top. From films of the beginning of its' collapse, it shows that it began at the
very top, some *10 floors* above where the fire was raging, and
1. Experts in metallugy have stated that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to cause the steel beams to fail from "sagging". Inspection of those beams was not done.
2. The "buffer" of 10 floors, (I'll do later, I'm o/of space...
2006-08-16
17:01:20
·
9 answers
·
asked by
charly
3