Astronomy & Space - July 2007

2007-07-24 10:18:34 · 15 answers · asked by Tavaris S 1

2007-07-24 10:07:14 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it mostly on acceleration to speed and then back to zero?
Also why is the speed of choice always seem to be around 25,000 MPH

2007-07-24 09:57:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am curious what YOU think. Can it be done now? If not, when do you think it might be able to be done? I know large, planetary scale, terraforming might take a long time, but what about creating city sized enclosures and terraforming in there? What other planets and moons are realistic for terraforming? I was thinking like Mars, possibly the poles of Mercury, Ganymede, Triton. I am just very curious what others think about this topic.

2007-07-24 09:57:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anthony G 2

2007-07-24 09:31:59 · 37 answers · asked by Adam D 1

2007-07-24 09:14:48 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-24 08:48:02 · 14 answers · asked by Sajiah Z 1

Bill graduated from USC in 1949 with a degree in English (Science was not offered). He was employed with Rocketdyne from 1957-1963 as a file clerk (he never worked for NASA). After, he made his living as a self published writer. He wrote books on cooking and travel, and conspiracies. These include We never went to the moon, Neither did the Russians, We went and met aliens, We went and met Nazi's, NASA murdered the Apollo 1 crew, NASA murdered the Challenger crew, a variety of Howard Hughes stories, and a bizarre retelling of the Apollo 13 story. In 1981 he self published a book called "We Never Went to the Moon", based on the 1978 movie, Capricorn One. His book was quickly forgotten. Kasing tried to sue their publisher, claiming they changed their copyright date and stolen his idea. The case was thrown out of court. In 2001, Fox TV aired a special rehashing his long debunked potboiler. The theory caught on with a whole new generation who had no memory of the Moon Landings.

2007-07-24 08:10:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am not sure how i would set this up to figure it out. Would I use the frequency of red-light and caluclate it with 3x10^8 m/s for visible light? But how would I factor in the 0.001 mm, I would compare...? Thanks...

2007-07-24 08:09:42 · 5 answers · asked by ASTRONOMAD 1

I have just orderd sky+ and wanted to no what people thought of it?

2007-07-24 08:04:06 · 7 answers · asked by Chris W 2

This is the last question that I'm going to ask on Telescopes as I'm getting fed up.I am not eniterly convinced that the Meade ETX90 is a powerful telescope,it just seems really small and plus the images that they show on the Meade website are not entirely covincing either.The images of some planets are very blurry,and I'd want it to be detailed enough to see bands on the Planets surface.Also the Telescope appears to very small.I can accept the fact that I'm probably not going to have a RCX400,seing as the starting price for that is $5,000!,but sometime in the future when I have a job of my own,I'll buy one.The only better Schmidt Cassegrain I found was the 8"LX90GPS Meade and that costs $1,999,take that $1,999 and convert it into £s and you get £983.42 .This is under £1,000,What I want to know is,is an 8" LX90GPS good enough to see Galaxys and Planets in some detail,without beong blurry?

2007-07-24 07:57:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I heard some rumours lately that the video we were sent from the moon was not real.What do you think

2007-07-24 07:32:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need the mathmathic formulas.

2007-07-24 07:07:43 · 8 answers · asked by farzane l 2

2007-07-24 06:50:41 · 18 answers · asked by shall_i 1

2007-07-24 06:33:06 · 10 answers · asked by shall_i 1

2007-07-24 06:16:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

What mission(s) did they fly?

2007-07-24 06:05:19 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-24 05:56:50 · 5 answers · asked by brian 2

what will happen to nasa,and why will there be no more space flights,does that mean for civilians too?If were suposed to be studying space,what will we do then?

2007-07-24 05:29:23 · 7 answers · asked by will79601 3

2007-07-24 05:27:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

* *
*
*
*

2007-07-24 05:12:16 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-24 04:56:03 · 19 answers · asked by kate 1

2007-07-24 04:54:23 · 3 answers · asked by swarnalatha v 1

2007-07-24 04:03:44 · 5 answers · asked by monster1832 1

I really need to know and I knew that Yahoo answers would help alot. I just hope that someone would answer my question correctly. Thanks.

2007-07-24 03:59:58 · 9 answers · asked by Andrea 1

2007-07-24 03:44:21 · 15 answers · asked by happytramp 4

i've heard that heaven is in sky.....then where?????

2007-07-24 03:34:14 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it sales reps?

2007-07-24 03:16:43 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would it take off or not?

2007-07-24 02:58:48 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like you launch a small nucluear charge out of the stern of the ship and it detonates, and the enormous force propels the ship forward even faster? Then you had thrusters to keep it on course, but the bombs would provide the motive power! Would it work? Would it be faster than conventional rockets? If I built one of these ships, would YOU ride in it?

2007-07-24 02:58:31 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous