Ohhhhhhhhhhh, not again. This question gets asked daily on this board, I'll just refer you to : http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
2007-07-24 07:51:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by RationalThinker 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
The Apollo landings were real.
There were 6 landings and many videos and photographs, plus lots of Moon rocks were brought back and some are on display in museums.
Your question, which asks about THE video, implies you think there was only one. It shows you are not fully aware of the size of the project or the amount of public attention it got. Sadly, few today care about it. But if you do care, see the source. It has many videos showing the flag not waving, because it doesn't, except when the astronauts touch it and shake it.
2007-07-24 08:39:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wow, Of course we went to the moon. And we are going back to the moon in 2011 or so, and we are using the basic technology from the Apollo Program. The evidence is undeniable. I don't know what video you have watched but I've talked to astronauts myself, that have been to the moon. Think about it logically- why would we have spent millions of dollars on a rocket that would just land somewhere else on the earth. How could Apollo 13 happened? Why would we have launched that many rockets if we were just doing it for show? And I know for a fact we could not have lost Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee, just because we wanted to say we were going to the moon.
Its almost unbelievable that people actually think we fake multiple moon landings.
2007-07-24 08:04:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spacepirate 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
One of the marks of pseudoscience is that the flimsiest of evidence in support of an idea will be given a huge weight compared to the strong evidence in contradiction to the idea.
What level of evidence would convince a moon-landing conspiracy person that the moon landings ever occurred? Is there any level of evidence? If we had a super-telescope that could see the landing sites, would that be enough, or would they discount the image as a forgery, part of the cover-up?
If no level of evidence can change a person's mind, is that person thinking rationally about the subject?
2007-07-24 09:22:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by 2 meter man 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think that despite the tide of evidence, and the flood of tired
reactions by some people to your rational question, you are correct to doubt any preposition.
May I refer everyone to Rene Descartes?
If there is in existence a Master Deceiver, then everything that we hold to be true, could be doubted.
Aref
2007-07-28 07:30:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aref H4 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was there to see the launch of apollo 11 and it was real.
First, the flag weighed less than a gram and had a spring in it to make it stand out for pictures. The LEM outgasses oxigen and hydrogen which causes small puffs of wind.
You don't build a rocket with 160,000,000 horse power and then not go someplace with it
2007-07-24 07:55:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Well, where do I begin. First of all, it's "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind". Second of all, he was SUPPOSED to say, "One small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind". And lastly, no it was not faked, videotaped in a studio, etc. It was real.
2007-07-24 07:53:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
I think I'm tired of answering this question.
2007-07-24 08:02:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by quantumclaustrophobe 7
·
7⤊
1⤋
Wait.I'll answer this question as soon as I'm able.
What??!!So,you're giving me thumbs downs A?!We'll see.NOW GIVE ME SOME THUMBS UPS!!!!!!!!!!I said wait.Why did you do it.I'm searching for your answer.Cheas,learn some respect.
2007-07-24 07:36:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7091082/
http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2005/06/27/moon-hoax-originator-has-died/
http://www3.telus.net/summa/moonshot/random.htm
http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id181/pg1/
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Bill%20Kaysing.htm
http://www.jyi.org/volumes/volume10/issue2/features/cull.html
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
http://www.lunarsoil.com/archives/000737.php
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/
http://www.metroactive.com/papers/cruz/07.25.96/moon-9630.html
2007-07-24 08:26:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋